Status Updates From Žižek Responds!

The piece by Zaloua and Zizek's response characterize completely what I call the post-Trumpian era of his praxis. Lacan is made to serve a populist Far-Left movement which denies admitting it is merely the polar opposite of what it pretends to emancipate (someone) from. The first sentence itself, the definition of anti-racism, is profoundly Fascist, if these Far-Left standards are to be applied.

Bjerre's essay is one of the greatest bits of Zizekian studies I've read; and Zizek's response is some of the best moments of separation. The absolute highlights of Zizek's own hypocrisy, as we are now informed by his latest works, are perhaps some of the most potent _demonstrations_ of the inconsistency of the Other (Zizek), and leave us to work-against him, as it were "rescuing Lacan from him" at times.