Status Updates From Which Trinity? Whose Monoth...
Which Trinity? Whose Monotheism? Philosophical and Systematic Theologians on the Metaphysics of Trinitarian Theology by
Status Updates Showing 1-30 of 32
Ming Chen
is on page 54 of 264
Currently on Latin Trinitarianism. With no background in analytical philosophy or philosophical theology, this book is giving me close to what R. C. Sproul called an "Excedrin headache".
— Dec 28, 2022 01:39AM
Add a comment
Jacob Aitken
is on page 50 of 264
Dizzying. Several ironies in the current Trinitarian debate: 1) everyone presupposes that the Athanasian Creed (falsely so-called) is a binding conciliar document. It is nothing of the sort, and trying to make your models match that is just creating problems. 2) Athanasius and the Cappadocians avoided most of these problems (Partly because they weren't tied down tot he Athanasian Creed)
— Mar 25, 2017 11:41AM
Add a comment
Jonathan
is on page 60 of 264
In the first chapter McCall gives a very helpful and surprisingly extensive summary of different models of the trinity."
— Mar 09, 2013 07:58AM
Add a comment
Jonathan
is on page 60 of 264
In the first chapter McCall gives a very helpful and surprising extensive summary of different models of the trinity.
— Mar 09, 2013 07:57AM
Add a comment





