Corey > Recent Status Updates

I think it doesn't help that I don't really care about a character's struggle with infertility

Oh my gd I think I hate this more than any of the bad books I read on purpose

Oh I am NOT enjoying this

I dislike when books talk about covid tbh

Still conflating urea and urine

There's urea in your sweat too, it's not just found in urine. She could just as easily be promoting sweat therapy here

I have never once received lotion in the hospital so I guess this lady is getting better care than me

Also a LOT of conflating in vitro and in vivo studies here

Urine is abacterial. It is NOT sterile.

Stop telling AIDS patients to drink urine for fucks sake lady

It just keeps going and she's yet to actually cite anything properly

Citing a book by some guy again

Something containing vitamins and minerals does not make it a nutrient. Human shit also contains vitamins and minerals but I'm not gonna eat it

Same fucking concept you weirdo

Now she's just listing study titles which tell you nothing about the conclusion of the study 😭

This lady loves to conflate urine and urea when it's convenient and then insist they're vastly different when it comes to choosing to use a urea pharmaceutical over drinking piss

I mean all of this is evidence of the usefulness of urea

Literally none of it is evidence for drinking your own piss which should not contain a clinically useful level of urea. If it does you're dehydrated man

In rats

Conflating urine and urea AGAIN

I'd like to see some actual evidence or even just a full study but she's just quote mining to make it look like her position is supported.

Creationists do this shit too. It's annoying

She is now citing some more recent studies (eg: the 60s) but she's providing even less context for those which tells me they don't say what she's claiming they say at all

These are case notes which are different from a case study and notably because they are just case notes they're anecdotal at best

Like it's fully not a study it's just some guy saying stuff and she's citing it as evidence and not as an opinion piece because she doesn't know any better

And this one just straight up isn't a study it's some guy bitching in a medical journal about how everyone else thinks he's a weirdo

Literally everything on planet earth is a potential carcinogen is the thing so her telling me a medication had potential carcinogenic properties doesn't really bother me

DO NOT TELL PEOPLE WITH HIV TO DRINK URINE ARE YOU TRYING TO KILL PEOPLE HOLY FUCK

It is making me genuinely nuts that all her "evidence" predates world war 2

Girl

Girl that sample size is so small as to be meaningless and we also hadn't developed ethics boards yet

Any study that old needs to be taken with an extremely large grain of salt

Conflating urea and urine again

Look man I know you wrote this in the 90s but you got any source more recent than 1933?

Genuinely asking because citing something that old to make a medical argument is so dangerous actually

Also citing 1918 medical books is crazy even when she wrote this in 1994

Like girl that study is 70 years out of date at LEAST

Interesting ellipses here Martha

What did you cut out? Because it looks like you may have cut out something important

And this is a book rather than a peer reviewed study