Briar > Recent Status Updates

How about a definition or five? None of the things Ham described as a religion in this chapter would be described as such outside young earth creationism.

How is someone borrowing from a Christian worldview when they're making an argument? I still don't understand this.

'the Bible is true because any alternative would make things like knowledge, logic, and truth impossible.' Why? Even for someone who takes the Bible literally, there are plenty of different interpretations and ideas that can come from it.. I don't see how limiting oneself to a book and one perspective is healthy.

More poking at other apologetics tactics. Would this help a Christian reader?

This chapter is kinda funny and he did not intend it to be. It admits he pre supposes his conclusion and works from there. Even trying to poke holes in other apologetics approaches.

Seemed like a good description. Still don't trust it. However, this chapter keeps with the theme of accepting parts of the science you like while saying ignore the bits that point to an older earth or universe.

This could have been an interesting chapter if the author provided more than the Christian perspective. You'd think the Jewish one would be included at least. Don't trust their descriptions.