MeiMeiSam > Recent Status Updates

Can anyone explain what his thoughts are by the term of phenomenology? Fragments are what we perceive upon any ideas we encounter with the external world. Unity is just an utility to explain theoretically on the perception in our consciousness and ethically, it is all ascribed to religion that all are the creation by God.

All things are constituted of components, no matter what it is of spirituality and materiality, this is an matter of Name. To look closer from the view of Mathesis, it is all transcribed into what is ration. Ration is a must of objectication in making All into representation on the phenomenon plain. This is called materialism but to look closer into theoretical plain, it is all just ideal conceptualization.

Name is conventionally regarded as a kind of title imposed onto everything, including humanity. It is a representation of that object's constitutions but upon history, it was embedded inside a conglomeration of events, represented as science of knowledge which is objectized into rationality of history. In these, name was essentially arisen to give its objects a representation under History.

It seems humanity hasn't created civilization since it was God who granted all the goodness to bestow reason upon humanity. It was all taken for granted that Human couldn't have survived on their own even producing a single alphabet without the ration that God created the civilization for them.

It's ineluctable that human was made in the image of God according to The Bible. I don't believe there is ever Evolution and the reason shown in the relationship between Human and the other animals concurs exactly what God ordained Adam to name and to rule the animal kingdom.

I don't believe in primordial soup that, through evolutionary process, evolved into primordial organism like algae and monocellular organism. It's not likely that evolution exists because reason in the spiritualism leads to the explanation that it is uniquely one in creation. Human was always human for ever and ever!

I am now convinced that Man was made in the image of God who commanded him to govern the other animals and creatures. There is intellect within all creatures.

The Universe is such a miracle that it is under the circumstances of being made with precision in a way that rationality is even included in the creation. Rationality has become something not in the control of the materialism but it is The Being. This is to be a question of really very tiny precision on the matter of Being which is now included in the matter of Materialism on whether Existentialism is a must!

Here the tedious articles with several passages propose that genesis is simply the reminder of how humanity were made along with their inscribed languages like masaonry and spirituality. These are what knowledge meant to be. Is it true that humanities were born with knolwedge? This brings out a problem that existentialism should have been all false knowledge if The Bible was to triumph.

Our consciousness is a must for linking up the signifying element and the signified representation to make an ideal worldliness. I think it's the humane mindedness that is critical for a conglomeration of ideal ideas to be elaborated into a representation which is representing the wholeness with its thrown into identities.

Temporarily, I have been inspired with an idea of how, actually, the cosmology was brought into existence with such a mere theoretical idea that binary relationship of various analystical components called representing and representation, can lead to the greatness of creation. There must be an critical form intermediary.

Until this page, I have got to know that 'Logic' isn't as simple as I ever thought. Complexity is the cosmology and it means to be the knowledge of our world through the logical representation. In addition to the intuition, whether the worldliness is existed or not, according to what discontinuity has proposed.

Until I have proceeded to this page, I, at last, find that in the Genesis, it was really true Adam named all the things caused by the time of primordial era, language had been unique and this uniqueness was meant 'Supreme'.

Until this page, I have got inspired with an idea that numerals are must for reflection as subjectivity must be resembled by an objective, which this relationship forms a resemblance of numeral measures.

I have just been into the very beginning on the theme for introducing what visual representation is from the analysis of a materpiece which is a portrait on a canvas. The picture is under the conformation of visual reasoning which leads the humane visualization into the realm of automatical reason of the universality of spatial moment. This spatial moment is a must for bringing mathematical reasoning into Art.

Until this page, it has remained me of The Logic that leads the cosmological universe to have its cosmology contextualized into nihilistic individualism that means to have The Log, no matter space or time, manifested in forms of pitch, just the same in music, to conform into microuniverse that is only a theoretical Logic.

Until this page, I have got an idea on what John Locke wrote about percepton and the world. I think John Locke got the idea on pondering about the mind and the surrounding that led to what is comprised as the worldliness. This is a comprised functions to create a worldliness so conventional and I think visualization plays a role of stationary lgoical sentence to describe the phenomenon only.

Until this page, although it hasn't obviously stated, it leads to a stern scientific fact that everything is of notes. A man has his note, meaning to be his unique identity. The author brings out the theory that the universe is composed of wave.

Really, music tells of the truth about the cosmology of the universe that is the phenotype that varieties of knowledge got its thrown arrow of compass that had better been considered as 'Logic'. Until this page, it insidiously tells of the entities that are referred to an arrow from which 'Logic' is arisen and from the theory about music, we can get meaningful conceptualization of 'Logic' which is thrown from beats.

Until this page, al last I have got to know how the identities we own under different circumstances appeal to make any impacts onto our situation!

From the infromation here about how such a varieties of lineages of southern people whom migrated from southern part of Mainland China, gives an idea on peoples not only depend on material for living but idealism has been a must for their historical developement as 'Lineage' in the materialism.

It has just inspired me with such an idea that leads to a very brand-new ideal conformation on the various phenomena, from which all ascribed to such a single 'step', that had better been pondered or contemplated as the very original ideal nous. History was arisen from this very single 'step'!

Until this page, I had a doubtful interogation on whether those from New Guinea would have come to the big continent-- Australia's North-Western part, by only very primordial transportation, canoes. The strait was of surging waves and strong torrents, moreover, sometimes, tempests. Those from New Guinea were without compass so that how they came to the big continent was no clue! The 'Organon' is in question!

Until the page I have just finished, I have a brand-new idea on the ideal process on how 'Thing' comes into things, that conventional stubborn ideal process always depended onto very superficial 'idea' and 'routine', which had shaped the vast multitude their vicious illiteracy.

Until this page, I have got inspired by an idea that a group of people is manipulated by its size which bestows its complexity. This is what a society can be successful or not, dependent onto its routine system of administration under the circumstances that effeciency is a must!

I am in chapter 13. I have reached on the topic about how inventions were made, aiming at not only superficially pragmatic purposes but sometimes, an invention came into circulation widely caused of unintended purposes under an errand idea. Just want to express my point of languages' colloquially coming into usage, was of pragmatic needs authentically. I disagree to the author's view that languages were ideas only!

Up to this quote:"Even if Luther, Zwingli, and others had died in their cradles,it seems likely yhay some reformers would still have turned to the press to implement long-lived pastoral concerns and evangelical claims." This reminds me of what the mass majority is meant to itself under what sociology has taught.

Just a moment ago, I have read up to the present page which temporarily gives me an account of what all these events happened, surrounding what Gutenberg was doing in both receiving the legacy from Roman Empire and leaping out into the future by continuing the critical mission, which now the world gets its welfare as modernization was derived from its shadow. It's all ascribed to the cultural 'Eudaimonia'.

Once one has read a word, it means he has just authentically taken for granted for the essence which by no means, exists as 'not being time dependent'.

Today I have reached the part which makes me think for awhile upon how the world was shaped. So as if it wasn't literacy, there wouldn't have been masonry because there wouldn't be any technology to have the goodness of ideas performed out into the worldliness through what is called ideology. Through ideology, we have our world!