Roughly 2 thirds of the way through. Heading towards a probable 2 stars. Some of the historical discussion is worth reading, but then the author sprinkles in random overt opinions without backing it up, or glosses over successes to focus on issues or failures. I also get the impression the author may have read but not engaged deeply with theory (or read someone else's understanding).
— Feb 18, 2025 06:22PM
Add a comment