Parker > Recent Status Updates

Later than ideal, but through the OT.

Re-reading this with a group of seminary friends.

So far, this might be the most helpful resource I'm reading on Malachi.

It's just occurred to me, several weeks in, that I haven't "told" Goodreads I'm reading this. This book is incredible.

'Tis spookem season.

Something I've been thinking about lately: Gibson prefers diachronic, "author-oriented" criteria for determining what inner-biblical connections are relevant for interpreting a given text. But I think there's a case to be made that the doctrine of inspiration, with its implication of dual authorship, may provide theological grounds for a synchronic approach that treats two texts as mutually dependent.

One thing's certain: Verhoef is thorough. 14 pages into the commentary and we're just now getting to Haggai 1:4!

Preparing to preach through Malachi, and then reading the section on Haggai for personal edification.

Reading for the class on the law I'm teaching.

And on page 420 of my edition, no less.

Small group study at the church. Decent discussion material, but I wouldn't call it well-researched. Kinda mid-researched.

Roughly halfway through "The Shadows" and this story is 100% the vibe. Totally see what Lewis saw in MacDonald's writing.

Reading the translation by Richard Regan in the Oxford World Classics collection of Anselm's major works.

The vibe I'm getting is Scotus' talk doesn't actually mean much.