Jim Syler’s Reviews > The Passion of Ayn Rand > Status Update
Jim Syler
is on page 301 of 464
>there was no one to object to the attacks, no one to oppose them, no one with a public name, a public reputation, a public voice, to speak for her in that world which was vilifying her, to defend her, to fight for her, to name the nature and the stature of her accomplishment.
— May 15, 2025 08:44AM
Like flag
Jim’s Previous Updates
Jim Syler
is on page 271 of 464
>That evening,Ayn exhibited a lack of human empathy that was astonishing.As Nathaniel, who conducted the conversation—it had the aura of a trial, except that the accused had no defense attorney—was pointing out the young woman's psychological deficiencies, he occasionally made some especially compelling point, succinct and well-phrased.Each time, Ayn chuckled with appreciation—and clapped her hands in applause.
— May 15, 2025 01:30PM
Jim Syler
is on page 303 of 464
>For Ayn, the use of her mind, the solving of the most complex of problems, was an effortless, joyous activity, it was the sole unchanging and permanent source of happiness in her life. To think, to see, to understand, to know, seemed to her as simple and uncomplicated as drawing breath; and the conclusions she reached seemed as clear and evident as the need to draw those breaths.
— May 15, 2025 12:44PM
Jim Syler
is on page 303 of 464
>He did not see the world as the bleak, irrational place that Ayn now considered it to be, and he searched desperately for reasons to give her hope, reasons to make her feel she was not living in the last days of the Roman Empire, reasons to convince her that there was more in the world around her than blank and corrupt mindlessness.
— May 15, 2025 11:08AM
Jim Syler
is on page 260 of 464
So insightful. I think that she's exactly right as to Rand's motivations here.
— May 08, 2025 07:17PM
Jim Syler
is on page 233 of 464
>We began to see each other frequently, and our relationship continued when our education took us to Los Angeles, as we struggled together to find a consistent view of a complex world, to find the answers to questions to which The Fountainhead had given us a key, but had not yet opened the door.
— May 04, 2025 04:00PM
Jim Syler
is on page 225 of 464
> "Dagny is myself, with any possible flaws eliminated," Ayn once said. "She is myself without my tiredness, without my chronic slightly anti-material feeling, without that which I consider the ivory tower element in me, or the theoretician versus the man of action. . . . Dagny is myself without a moment of exhaustion."
#keep
— May 04, 2025 02:04PM
#keep
Jim Syler
is on page 225 of 464
>The errors that set Dagny and Rearden in conflict with Galt and Francisco are what Ayn defined as errors of knowledge, not breaches of morality.
— May 04, 2025 01:43PM
Jim Syler
is on page 224 of 464
>"and all the years of ugliness and struggle were only someone's senseless joke." Those years would come to an end for Dagny, through the living reality of John Galt. But they were not to end for Ayn.
— May 04, 2025 01:31PM
Jim Syler
is on page 208 of 464
>"A man wears a moustache or beard," she would say, "because he wants to hide behind it; there's something he wants to conceal, not just a physical defect, but a spiritual defect; I would never trust such a man."
— May 04, 2025 09:27AM
Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Jim
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
May 15, 2025 08:57AM
Yeah, and there's a reason for that. If you're going to stand up and give a "fuck you" to the world, if you're going to stake your stature and your reputation on someone else's words, someone else's vision, which goes against every moral intuition of almost everyone, it had better be entirely right. It had better be completely defensible in every detail. If I'm going to hook my wagon to a new philosophy, one which indicts nearly every aspect of our society and most people's worldview and behavior, it had better damn well be unimpeachable, or else I'll be answering solely for its flaws, forever. And Atlas Shrugged is not. It's close—astonishingly, wondrously close—and as inspirational, thought-provoking fiction it's wonderful. But the ideas are not quite those one would wish to chuck everything and go to the barricades for. It's hard to pinpoint exactly why not—I'd have to do a detailed study—but even I, who have always been very largely in sympathy with Rand's vision and goals, have had great difficulty being willing to stand up and full-throatedly endorse her. It might be different if she didn't make it perfectly clear that there's no wiggle room whatsoever; that you either swallow her philosophy in toto, without reservation or exception—or you're evil. I simply can't go there, and I cannot condemn as fundamentally evil and "death-worshippers" 99% of the populace. And Rand herself makes clear that to stand up and defend her is to do just that.
reply
|
flag

