Burke Berry’s Reviews > Defending Life: A Moral and Legal Case against Abortion Choice > Status Update
Burke Berry
is on page 23 of 314
1) the difference between the pro-life and pro choice position is NOT about inconsistent moral principles
2) the position of Roe holds that the states interest in prenatal life becomes compelling after viability,except for preservation of life/health for mother. What defines health was made way too broad by Doe v Bolton (1973). Thus, by the 1980s, some justices of the majority opinion in Roe had changed their view
— Sep 17, 2025 04:14PM
2) the position of Roe holds that the states interest in prenatal life becomes compelling after viability,except for preservation of life/health for mother. What defines health was made way too broad by Doe v Bolton (1973). Thus, by the 1980s, some justices of the majority opinion in Roe had changed their view
Like flag
Burke’s Previous Updates
Burke Berry
is on page 123 of 314
“ a society whose ethic asserts that certain pre-born human beings, forfeit their right to life simply because they have a certain physical deformity or mental handicap is a society that has put in its social fabric premises that will make it more likely for it citizens to judge those born human beings with the same flaws as having lives ‘not worth living’”
— Oct 21, 2025 07:36PM
