Fiona’s Reviews > Is a River Alive? > Status Update
Fiona
is on page 19 of 384
"This infrastructural reframing of the river, [Martin Heidegger] argued, was symbolic of the broader consequences of technocracy’s administrative effort to entrap nature ‘as a calculable coherence’. Nothing is good in and of itself; everything must be good for something."
— Nov 24, 2025 06:32PM
Like flag
Fiona’s Previous Updates
Fiona
is on page 184 of 384
"How we imagine the matter of water matters. To recognize its ceaseless migrancy is to recognize that we live in a fundamentally decentralized world, engaged always in multiple forms of relation – and that power can be crucial in determining the capacity of those relations to animate or to exhaust their participants."
— Nov 25, 2025 02:30AM
Fiona
is on page 167 of 384
"Many details of what is known as the ‘Coromandel Slave Trade’ are only now coming to light – for the Dutch have been more efficient than even the British at disguising the barbarisms of their empire."
— Nov 24, 2025 11:14PM
Fiona
is on page 129 of 384
"The area is honeycombed by termites, but the villagers give rice to the termites each morning, so that the termites don’t eat their buildings. And it works! I am very interested in this idea of so-called “pest species” being better understood as “tax collectors” for the more-than-human world.’"
— Nov 24, 2025 09:59PM
Fiona
is on page 82 of 384
"To call a river alive is not to personify a river, but instead further to deepen and widen the category of ‘life’, and in so doing – how had George Eliot put it? – ‘enlarge the imagined range for self to move in’."
— Nov 24, 2025 08:01PM
Fiona
is on page 23 of 384
"A good grammar of animacy can still re-enchant existence. To imagine that a river is alive causes water to glitter differently. New possibilities of encounter emerge – and loneliness retreats a step or two. You find yourself falling in love outward, to use Robinson Jeffers’s beautiful phrase."
— Nov 24, 2025 06:37PM

