Frank Perdomoโ€™s Reviews > Humanish: What Talking to Your Cat or Naming Your Car Reveals About the Uniquely Human Need to Humanize > Status Update

Frank Perdomo
Frank Perdomo is on page 126 of 304
Halfway through this book ๐Ÿ“– and im still longing to hear ๐Ÿ‘‚ about plants & anthropomorphic behavior. BUT i know this is part of the shortcomings of Science. The author โœ๏ธ clearly points out the bias of most researchers to limit research ๐Ÿ”ฌ to a window ๐ŸชŸ that fits grants and academic calendars ๐Ÿ“….
Dec 07, 2025 07:04AM
Humanish: What Talking to Your Cat or Naming Your Car Reveals About the Uniquely Human Need to Humanize

flag

Frankโ€™s Previous Updates

Frank Perdomo
Frank Perdomo is on page 126 of 304
Dec 07, 2025 07:04AM
Humanish: What Talking to Your Cat or Naming Your Car Reveals About the Uniquely Human Need to Humanize


Frank Perdomo
Frank Perdomo is on page 42 of 304
Holy shit! ๐Ÿ’ฉ this book ๐Ÿ“• is good ๐Ÿ‘
I am reminded of the quote from 1984:
โ€œAnd yet the rage that one felt was an abstract, undirected emotion which could be switched from one object to another like the flame of a blowlamp.โ€
Nowadays dumb popularity rules AND simultaneously ignorant nazis fawn over cute ๐Ÿถ pups; the flame ๐Ÿ”ฅ of the "blowlamp" is anthropomorphism!
Dec 05, 2025 04:33AM
Humanish: What Talking to Your Cat or Naming Your Car Reveals About the Uniquely Human Need to Humanize


Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

Frank Perdomo Halfway through this book ๐Ÿ“– and im still longing to hear ๐Ÿ‘‚ about plants & anthropomorphic behavior. BUT i know this is part of the shortcomings of Science. The author โœ๏ธ clearly points out the bias of most researchers to limit research ๐Ÿ”ฌ to a window ๐ŸชŸ that fits grants and academic calendars ๐Ÿ“…. We will not see scientific research on trees ๐ŸŒณ that take longer to grow and study ๐Ÿ“š well beyond our lifetime, and this difference in temporal conditions is just briefly mentioned in the context of the sloth ๐Ÿฆฅ YET i was just reading about how Jefferson and Adams in a book ๐Ÿ“• about our Founding Gardeners treated the felling of trees on par with murder, i know i feel strongly about a tree cut down and others do too. There is a cultural element of life persisting past death that is also at play here, and skimming through the second half of the book i see that there will be some discussion of this, still im chocking this up to a "researcher" bias as to not placing significance in the afterlife of things, im talking about human ability to talk to clearly dead โ˜ ๏ธ objects, graves, ashes, etc. consulting the dead, and the religious context of afterlife surely has a major affect anthropomorphic ability.

Furthermore, plant ๐Ÿชด bias is also rooted in a difficulty in determining the extent or bounds of an individual. I think it is very hard for anyone to say where a plant starts and stops. A cultural context of individualism or individuality would also be at work here. Objects or organisms that cannot clearly show segments or liminal boundaries make it harder to anthropomorphize. There is more to be said about this AND this dovetails into another "researcher" bias of NOT easily being able to parse hard science with humanities, cross disciplinary thought is limited by this laser focused time sensitive researcher focus on actionable science bound by easy measurement and again time. I see now even more evidence of research geared toward materialist, mechanistic, behavioral economics: an academic researcher needs to fill a grant within a short window for another researcher to verify in a short window etc.

This all makes Science pretty limited in scope.


back to top