Ryan Mazzola’s Reviews > Capitalism: A Global History > Status Update

Ryan Mazzola
Ryan Mazzola is on page 48 of 1344
The author uses modern capitalist language and logics to describe Islamic merchants in the year 100 CE. I am sympathetic to his mission and commitment to deliver a sweeping history on such an expansive topic, but I find myself wanting more out of each section. He describes that traders at the port of Aden in the second century developed “institutions” but never really describes the aforementioned institutions.
Dec 11, 2025 04:23PM
Capitalism: A Global History

flag

Ryan’s Previous Updates

Ryan Mazzola
Ryan Mazzola is on page 1053 of 1344
Dec 26, 2025 04:06PM
Capitalism: A Global History


Ryan Mazzola
Ryan Mazzola is on page 963 of 1344
Dec 26, 2025 07:43AM
Capitalism: A Global History


Ryan Mazzola
Ryan Mazzola is on page 942 of 1344
Dec 25, 2025 04:48PM
Capitalism: A Global History


Ryan Mazzola
Ryan Mazzola is on page 850 of 1344
Dec 24, 2025 04:58PM
Capitalism: A Global History


Ryan Mazzola
Ryan Mazzola is on page 820 of 1344
Dec 23, 2025 11:29AM
Capitalism: A Global History


Ryan Mazzola
Ryan Mazzola is on page 704 of 1344
Dec 22, 2025 07:52AM
Capitalism: A Global History


Ryan Mazzola
Ryan Mazzola is on page 650 of 1344
Dec 20, 2025 11:22AM
Capitalism: A Global History


Ryan Mazzola
Ryan Mazzola is on page 609 of 1344
Dec 19, 2025 01:44PM
Capitalism: A Global History


Ryan Mazzola
Ryan Mazzola is on page 565 of 1344
Dec 19, 2025 07:37AM
Capitalism: A Global History


Ryan Mazzola
Ryan Mazzola is on page 541 of 1344
Dec 19, 2025 06:05AM
Capitalism: A Global History


Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

Ryan Mazzola He then describes long-distance traders using their capital to accumulate more capital — a defining feature of capitalism … but he doesn’t describe exactly how they are doing this? He merely states that they “invest in the production of a few commodities” and “the establishment of long-distance trade” but why exactly does this mean? How does this relate to capital accumulation? Also where did this logic develop from? There must’ve been a material circumstance that made it advantageous to use wealth to beget wealth… but he doesn’t remark on any of these important questions.


back to top