Zarish Fatima’s Reviews > Pakistan Beyond the "Crisis State" > Status Update

Zarish Fatima
Zarish Fatima is on page 85 of 320
Feb 15, 2017 07:43PM
Pakistan Beyond the "Crisis State" (Columbia/Hurst)

3 likes ·  flag

Zarish’s Previous Updates

Zarish Fatima
Zarish Fatima is on page 242 of 320
The essays regarding economy during Musharraf period were an eye opener.
Mar 10, 2017 10:15PM
Pakistan Beyond the "Crisis State" (Columbia/Hurst)


Zarish Fatima
Zarish Fatima is on page 202 of 320
Mar 08, 2017 10:05PM
Pakistan Beyond the "Crisis State" (Columbia/Hurst)


Zarish Fatima
Zarish Fatima is on page 37 of 320
Dr. Akbar Ahmed essay is simply incredible and his analysis of Stanley Wolpert's, of handling the Quaid's last addresses is exactly what I thought too.
Feb 07, 2017 09:37PM
Pakistan Beyond the "Crisis State" (Columbia/Hurst)


Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

Muhammad Ahsen Tahiri I liked Akbar Khan and Ayesha Jalal <3 Others were good too. But Mohsin Hamid wrote just nontechnical type article (and novel-ish style).


Muhammad Ahsen Tahiri BTW have you read Nadeem F. Paracha? Highly recommended! :P You'll die laughing.


message 3: by Zarish (last edited Feb 26, 2017 09:10AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Zarish Fatima Akbar Ahmed(or khan?) and Mohsin Hamid I liked.Mohsin is my favourite and his optimism and positivity is what we need and his nationalism is what I believe should be.


Zarish Fatima Ayesha Jalal, I am not, so big on. Her ideas though on point just had a bit too much of snarl in them. Madeeha lodhi on other hand was very inspiring, her anger and frustration could be felt in undercurrent of all her essay.


Zarish Fatima Nadeem F Paracha of Dawn?
He is pretty good, slightly too alt-left for my taste and borders on offensive at times but he is better than most humorist writers.


message 6: by Muhammad (last edited Feb 27, 2017 04:18AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Muhammad Ahsen Tahiri Yeah sorry Akbar Ahmed, the ambassador.

Well Mohsin Hamid wrote well and was optimist but thing is when you come to practicality, things are not that simple. Eg low revenue collection and stagnant taxes are due greatly to politicians and industrialists and other rich men getting off the tax net; poor men only make a little difference in tax paying. AND just moral words don't matter at all to those 'rich men'. Vigorous forging of system and use of force will do. Those who levy taxes (parliamentarians) are so **poor** that they themselves don't pay, what do we expect from common people then? :/

Change is not poor people paying taxes but the leaders and rich men added to tax-net, to whom moralityn alone does not matter.


message 7: by Muhammad (last edited Feb 27, 2017 04:40AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Muhammad Ahsen Tahiri And regarding Ambassador Akbar, seriously so less people are left who do think that Islam does matter in politics and that secularist rule has better alternative as Islam, like minority rights you don't need a secular country to safeguard minority rights. Islam did give a system for it (army for protection, and Muslims if found culprit, punished, equal rights to religious practices, and safety for religious places). This is why the so-called untouchables (Achoots) and Sikhs of some regions of Subcontinent opted for Pakistan after separation.

More-ever Quaid's speech, "you are free to go to your temples.." was much misinterpreted even amongst Muslims themselves. He was not talking about secularism but the safeguard of minority rights; as he had said I'll constitute myself the protector-general for minority. (The pact was signed in 1950)


back to top