Lauren’s Reviews > Reclaiming Science from Darwinism: A Clear Understanding of Creation, Evolution, and Intelligent Design > Status Update

Interesting that images only get sources when the sources are religious or pro-ID

It has occurred to me, is he ever going to make his point? Or just word vomit mostly nonsense pseudoscience in an attempt to disprove evolution, err, sorry, Darwinism?

Why are we discussing Lamarckian evolution (mockingly) if we're discussing Darwinian evolution? One rebukes the other...

Oh, the irony and lack of self awareness it takes to label a chapter with "how far out some people will walk on uncertain footing."

There is no recognized 4th law of thermodynamics. Quoting one person who came up with a "4th law" in order to support ID is pseudoscience.

Still doesn't get the actual difference between a law and theory in science... :(

Hint, laws are not better than theories. A google search clears this up, or reading chapter one of a biology book, so I have to assume bias, ignorance, or stubbornness?

Literally questioning the likelihood of fish starting to walk when we in fact have fish that walk and live outside water for brief periods, today. If you're going to doubt something, at least have a basic understanding of the animal kingdom.

Literal the least poorly written chapter so far was the young earth chapter, and despite the fact that I agree (sorry zealots, the earth is old) he still managed to provide poor evidence that even I (in agreement with him) could shoot down as poor evidence. Can't write to persuade to save his life.

Legit arguing states just haven't done a good enough job keeping ID non-religious so it can he slipped into schools. WTF. It's literally teaching Christian creation stories. You can't make that non-religious

To be clear, I have seen a reference for one scientific work throughout this whole book, but the first time he quotes the Bible, you better believe he's got each section referenced. Also, he finally gave credit for an image - drawn by his son.