Neil Webb’s Reviews > Material Feminisms > Status Update
Neil Webb
is on page 287 of 434
The monism being presented seems to be Culture=Nature, which I can fundamentally get behind, "...political and ethical interests usually seen as separate are inextricably linked by the substantial transit across bodies and natures."
However, "the material world continually intra-acts in ways...too complex to be predicted in advance." Culture=Nature=Biology=Chemistry=Physics=Your subatomic theory of choice.
— Jun 23, 2026 12:35AM
However, "the material world continually intra-acts in ways...too complex to be predicted in advance." Culture=Nature=Biology=Chemistry=Physics=Your subatomic theory of choice.
Like flag
Neil’s Previous Updates
Neil Webb
is on page 155 of 434
Hmm, just finished Part 1. So far, there's a lot of word salad in which I can't find any reason.
Occasionally, they'll be a sentence or two that makes sense, but I'm just not sure, generally, what point is being made. Bohr and Foucault seem to be what I need to read first.
Anyway, so far, all I've picked up is that what we think of as matter is just the result of quantum field interactions.
— May 19, 2026 01:11AM
Occasionally, they'll be a sentence or two that makes sense, but I'm just not sure, generally, what point is being made. Bohr and Foucault seem to be what I need to read first.
Anyway, so far, all I've picked up is that what we think of as matter is just the result of quantum field interactions.
Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Neil
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Jun 23, 2026 12:52AM
What I'm trying to say is, until we understand the stack of interactions/Intra-actions all the way to the bottom, we can't define right or wrong, because everything that happens, culturally, is natural by definition.
reply
|
flag