David’s Reviews > The Age of Reform (Awarded the Pulitzer Prize for History, 1956): From Bryan to F.D.R. > Status Update

David
David is on page 223 of 352
"The central theme in Progressivism was this revolt against the industrial discipline: the Progressive movement was the complaint of the unorganized against the consequences of organization."

They're saying it's the worst summation of the Progressive Era of all time. Richard what the hell are you talking about. Patently absurd.
Aug 14, 2026 06:41AM
The Age of Reform (Awarded the Pulitzer Prize for History, 1956): From Bryan to F.D.R.

flag

David’s Previous Updates

David
David is on page 205 of 352
Aug 13, 2026 12:10PM
The Age of Reform (Awarded the Pulitzer Prize for History, 1956): From Bryan to F.D.R.


David
David is on page 70 of 352
Bad sourcing is a Hofstadter special. Ridiculous critique of Ignatius Donnelly as "sadistic" for his dystopian fiction. Hofstadter's attacks on the Populists from a liberal angle fall flat because he doesn't acknowledge the Herrenvolk nature of America writ large, only in the progressive Populist movement and rural anxieties. Reads like Clinton-Schumerian theory lol
Aug 13, 2026 10:34AM
The Age of Reform (Awarded the Pulitzer Prize for History, 1956): From Bryan to F.D.R.


Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

Reid tries to read Never read Hofstadter. Is he a fraud? The sentence you quoted alone is pretty damn stupid


David Yes and no. The entirety of the Consensus School historians read stupid nowadays. Hofstadter is particular is poorly regarded nowadays because he took extreme liberty with sourcing. He is more of a liberal philosopher of history than an actual historian. He qualifies this nonsense with an able analysis of the contraposition in the T. Rooseveltian federal power, but that just proves he had no reason to write the absurd quote above lol


back to top