Andrew McNeely’s Reviews > The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893-1958 > Status Update

Andrew McNeely
Andrew McNeely is on page 30 of 358
Critics of Dewey, take note:

“The paradox of John Dewey’s reputation is that, although he gained worldwide recognition during his own lifetime and has unquestionably earned a place in the panoply of the world’s great educators, his actual influence on the schools of the nation has been both seriously overestimated and grossly distorted.”
— Sep 14, 2026 05:01AM
The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893-1958

1 like ·  flag

Andrew’s Previous Updates

Andrew McNeely
Andrew McNeely is on page 105 of 358
— Oct 02, 2026 04:45AM
The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893-1958


Andrew McNeely
Andrew McNeely is on page 76 of 358
— Sep 30, 2026 04:42AM
The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893-1958


Andrew McNeely
Andrew McNeely is on page 59 of 358
— Sep 17, 2026 05:15AM
The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893-1958


Andrew McNeely
Andrew McNeely is on page 51 of 358
— Sep 15, 2026 12:18PM
The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893-1958


Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Andrew (new) - added it

Andrew McNeely More revisions from Kliebard:

Dewey never belonged to any of the competing interests groups that shaped the twentieth century American curriculum, nor did Dewey swoop into medieval confusion by leading a singular movement called “progressive education” against all the old humanist fogies. In fact, Dewey always advocated for a liberal arts humanist education throughout his distinguished career. Kliebard essentially argues that educational reformers seldom understood Dewey’s educational philosophy and didn’t really care to understand it.


back to top