Andrew’s Reviews > New Model Island: How to Build a Radical Culture Beyond the Idea of England > Status Update

Andrew
Andrew is on page 65 of 150
Another howler. Niven writes that the contradiction was that the "economic basis of NL was Thatcherite, and Thatcherism was of course a political movement firmly embedded in the south-east of England". In one sentence hes done a sleight of hand which conflates the economics of Thatcherism with its politics. Thatcherism was economically neoliberal, but politically Tory. NL was economically AND culturally neolib.
— Sep 22, 2026 04:09PM
New Model Island: How to Build a Radical Culture Beyond the Idea of England

flag

Andrew’s Previous Updates

Andrew
Andrew is on page 97 of 150
Was perhaps abit harsh on this. Section on Northumbria and Basil Bunting's poetry is genuinely fascinating and introduced me to his work (priority find now!). But still dont know where the fuck its going, its still hoplessly waffly, its argument is weak (its reliance of hearsay, unattributed sources, generalised cultural observations are hardly rigrious) and terribly self indulgent. So a perfect Zero Book then!
— Sep 25, 2026 04:17PM
New Model Island: How to Build a Radical Culture Beyond the Idea of England


Andrew
Andrew is on page 64 of 150
Almost half way am not fucking impressed. Tries to tart up Britpop as some absurd product of regional working class culture with an ear to 60s continental modernism, when plainly it was a macho postering, deeply consumerist establishment ploy recreating beach town mod thugginess. His argument that Blairism represented sublimated, warped New Left desires ignores a) new left desires were garbage and b) the late Marxist
— Sep 22, 2026 03:36PM
New Model Island: How to Build a Radical Culture Beyond the Idea of England


Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Andrew (new) - added it

Andrew Blair's forays into devolution and multiculturalism were far more complementary to neoliberalism than ever the Thatcherism ever was, fitting perfectly with the libertarian ideal of free borders for goods and labour and decentralisation of state power. Blair wasnt just Thatcher's heir, it was neoliberalism's, hence why the capitalist class had to shift its alligence to a Labour purged of any of its union or radical elements (Niven seems to almost presume that devolution was the fufilment of Campaign's agenda, which is just hilarious stupidity, and actively whitewashes how hostile it was to the New Left, Bennite agenda of devolution and House of Lords reform that he claims was part of NL's intital agenda in the first place!) to finish off its class project. Toryism had clearly ran itself into the ground precisely *because* of its very Thatcherite tendencies over Europe and 'Back to Basics', which made it impossible to stabilise itself as a project for neoliberal governance. Under Blair, we get the final legs of 'light toutch regulation', privatisation of key NHS services under PFI schemes and endless, bloated, nightmarish outsourcing schemes, and most importantly, BoE independence. Thatcher never achieved that. But Blair did. Devo, while nicer for the left and better for the peoples of those nations, wasnt done for any soft leftist agenda at all. In anyway. Christ this book is stupid.


back to top