Taran AM’s Reviews > Beyond Order: 12 More Rules For Life > Status Update

Taran AM
Taran AM is starting
Ok, so far Peterson has anyone explained how unwell him and his family have been in recent years, providing examples of several traumatic events they have gone through and how it resulted in extreme depression in him. He then talks about a conversation he had with his niece (?) where she shares her critiques of modern society, which he dismisses on the grounds of her being mentally unwell. He tries to make the …
— Sep 25, 2026 10:31AM
Beyond Order: 12 More Rules For Life

flag

Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Taran (new) - added it

Taran AM … claim that you have to get your own stuff in order before making any claims about the greater world. I think this is hilariously hypocritical following his proof of how unwell he’s been but also seems to imply that those who are not provided for by a system should have no say in how that system ought to change. Maybe I am misunderstanding his claim but as I understand it, he is saying that if you are not ‘put together’ enough (to some arbitrary degree) then your opinions are null.


message 2: by Taran (new) - added it

Taran AM If the bar of general put-togetherness is set to the degree of being mentally stable enough to have a cohesive and accurate understanding of the greater world then you can claim anyone below this bar lacks the abilities required to make meaningful claims about anything really (which could still be disputed) but he sets the bar way higher. In the example he provides with his own niece, he discounts her opinions in entirety because her life is not put together enough (for his standard) and because she is depressed.


message 3: by Taran (new) - added it

Taran AM So, when it comes to the question of how we could make the world a better place, only those who are well off should have a say. This view ignores the connection between the group of ‘those who a system is set up to support’ and ‘those who are well off’, implying that those who are doing well are doing well because of idk innate virtue of knowledge rather than being supported by the system. This leads to the only people who have a say in how a system ought to be set up being those who are most supported by it.


back to top