Oakleigh’s Reviews > The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values > Status Update

I read this 5 years ago and failed to leave a review ugh. If my terrible memory serves me though, I seem to dimly recall thinking his argument is perfectly rational as long as you accept "morally good = increased human flourishing". It drove my moral absolutist friends up the wall that I (stuck in the weak trough of indecisive moral relativism) wouldn't allow him that axiom lol. Excited to see if I've changed my mind