Andrew McNeely’s Reviews > The Melancholy of Resistance > Status Update

Andrew McNeely
Andrew McNeely is on page 130 of 314
While being slowly washed over by Krasznahorkai’s lava flow of prose, I find myself continually placing him and Charles Taylor in conversation.
— Oct 22, 2026 05:14AM
The Melancholy of Resistance (Apocalypse Quartet, #2)

flag

Andrew’s Previous Updates

Andrew McNeely
Andrew McNeely is on page 141 of 314
— Oct 22, 2026 08:22AM
The Melancholy of Resistance (Apocalypse Quartet, #2)


Andrew McNeely
Andrew McNeely is on page 114 of 314
— Oct 20, 2026 06:58PM
The Melancholy of Resistance (Apocalypse Quartet, #2)


Andrew McNeely
Andrew McNeely is on page 98 of 314
— Oct 19, 2026 06:58PM
The Melancholy of Resistance (Apocalypse Quartet, #2)


Andrew McNeely
Andrew McNeely is on page 65 of 314
— Oct 19, 2026 05:15AM
The Melancholy of Resistance (Apocalypse Quartet, #2)


Andrew McNeely
Andrew McNeely is on page 36 of 314
— Oct 16, 2026 12:05PM
The Melancholy of Resistance (Apocalypse Quartet, #2)


Andrew McNeely
Andrew McNeely is starting
Satantango was one of the best books I read last year. Really looking forward to this one!
— Oct 16, 2026 06:23AM
The Melancholy of Resistance (Apocalypse Quartet, #2)


Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Andrew (new) - added it

Andrew McNeely György Eszter is not convinced by your efforts at reenchantment:

“…quite apart from the age-old possibility of seeing the heavens at all through such dense clouds, he was convinced that Valuska’s cosmos had no relation whatsoever to the real one; it was, he thought, an image, something remembered from childhood perhaps, only an image, of some once-glimpsed universal order, an order that had become a personal domain, clearly luminous landscape that could never be lost, a pure religion which assumed that there was or might once have been a heavenly mechanism ‘driven by some hidden motor of enchantment and innocent dreaming.’” (pp. 105-106)


message 2: by Andrew (new) - added it

Andrew McNeely Eszter’s description of his own disenchantment is one of the very greatest encapsulations of what Charles Taylor dubbed the “immanent frame”:

“The world…consisted merely of ‘an indifferent power which offered disappointment at every turn’; its various concerns were incompatible and it was too full of noises of banging, screeching and crowing, noises that were simply the discordant and refracted sounds of struggle, and this was all there was to the world if we but realized it.” (p. 117)

(sidebar: Eszter hadn’t read Hartmut Rosa yet).


message 3: by Andrew (new) - added it

Andrew McNeely However, unlike Taylor’s aesthetic trajectories in a secular age that lends itself weight to our flattened existence, Eszter, a musicologist by profession, argues to the contrary:

“Faith, thought Eszter, recognizing his own stupidity, is not a matter of believing something, but believing that somehow things could be different; in the same way, music was not the articulation of some better part of ourselves, or a reference to some notion of a better world, but a disguising of the fact of our irredeemable selves and the sorry state of the world, but no, not merely a disguising but a complete, twisted denial of such facts: it was a cure that did not work, a barbiturate that functioned as an opiate.” (p. 117)

In Taylor’s framing, Eszter’s posture toward enchanted trajectories cashes out as a “closed spin”–materialism is just the way things are, a brute fact of life.


back to top