Beth’s Reviews > Interface > Status Update

I'm getting used to the mix of brand names (Starbucks) and in-Brands that are clear references to other existing brands, but it's not my favorite quirk. It feels like a joke that keeps going long after it should, but maybe that will change in time.

So far it is well-written, and though the inconsistency in addressing brands is distracting. Things are either iWhatevers or inWhatevers or interWhatevers with no apparent reasoning for the distinction. Some brands are named outright, but others are thinly veiled references. It's not clear why some brands are named and others are wink-nudged but it would've been cleaner to pick a scheme and stick to it.