TheArchive’s Reviews > Difference and Repetition > Status Update

d. is blabing about differential calculus. i'm listening with my loose ear.

misosophy. the image of thought is inflamed. those great thing prefiguring.

The syntheses of the uncons. go back as far as D&R?! maybe they're stolen?

Most of the pages of the copy of the second survived. They are stained and have got this off-white color to them as the plastic bag got torn, though not to a degree where it would be useless, hence why I don't bother replacing it.

I have walked 45 km with a copy of the second chapter, wrapped in a plastic bag inside my pocket. The bag got torn and the copy was soaked in sweat, the words mummbeling and streched over each other until I reached the end.
I hanged the pages on a little white rope in my tent. I hope they'll dry readable, because I need the copy to scribble my note on.

I think people are misleading themselves about d. seen D&R as an "invastigation" (what a funny terminology!) of those two concepts is at least misleading, for a reader that is. maybe for a philosopher that distinction would be more acurate. he is indeed, however, a great philosopher of the history of philosophy.......

It goes it goes it goes aye.
I'm getting the hang of it, which means, as previous expirimintation and messing-with reading d. has shown, that i am soon to lose it. oh well.