Chris’s Reviews > The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914-1991 > Status Update
Chris
is on page 171 of 627
I could tell from the Daily Mail review that Geoffry Levy hadn't actually read Hobsbawm's work. At this point, though l, it's completely obvious that he (and everyone else) took the loss of 15-20 million people (not "murder", as RWNJ would tell you) out of context. That quote refers to WWII, not Stalinist purges. Was it worth it? Was the world better because of those sacrifices? It's an important question.
— Jun 22, 2012 08:51PM
Like flag
Chris’s Previous Updates
Chris
is on page 333 of 627
"On the wilder shores of the American 1960s, where rock fans and student radicals met, the line between getting stoned and building barricades often seemed hazy." Well played, professor.
— Jul 05, 2012 06:04AM
Chris
is on page 161 of 627
"For the Second World War was, for those on the winning side, not merely a struggle for military victory, but - even in Britain and the USA - for a better society." Dubious for the leaders, but certainly for those who fought. There's the context for Hobsbawm's remarks about what people were willing to lose (not "murder" as the intellectually lazy and/or dishonest would have it).
— Jun 22, 2012 05:09AM
Chris
is on page 114 of 627
I've seen right-wing readers call Hobsbawm's history "Stalinist." Pretty sure they have no idea what that word means.
— Jun 19, 2012 06:37AM
