Abhishek’s Reviews > Buddhism in the Shadow of Brahmanism > Status Update
Abhishek
is on page 133 of 304
"There are no political inscriptions in Sanskrit that precede the middle of the second century CE. Before that date, political inscriptions in northern India had always used Middle Indic languages. Why did this change? "
— Feb 23, 2018 08:00AM
Like flag
Abhishek’s Previous Updates
Abhishek
is on page 131 of 304
It may be worth repeating that the Middle Indic languages used or adopted by the Buddhists were not derived from Sanskrit, not even from the earliest form of Sanskrit we know, Ṛgvedic Sanskrit. The base dialect (or dialects) of Pāli, for example, was (were) in several points more archaic than Ṛgvedic Sanskrit. What, then, may have driven certain Buddhists to adopt the language of their most fearsome competitors?
— Feb 23, 2018 07:56AM
Abhishek
is on page 125 of 304
"Whatever developments there have been in the area of astrology, astronomy and mathematics — which do not figure among the five sciences — are due to the efforts of brahmanical and jaina thinkers; for reasons that remain to be elucidated, the Buddhists did not participate."
This is turning out to be a most informative book.
— Feb 23, 2018 07:41AM
This is turning out to be a most informative book.

