Zoonanism’s Reviews > Hegel, Deleuze, and the Critique of Representation: Dialectics of Negation and Difference > Status Update

Somers-Hall writes "In fact, much modern work in embryology argues that many of the important processes in embryo development are the result of processes relying on differential speeds of development",
?In fact much of this work has progressed without any concern about the structure of transcendental field, or vitalist bergsonisms.

Bergson objects that: Spencer, in attempting to explain the genesis
of space, has resorted to "reconstructing evolution with fragments of the evolved"
?How else is one to reconstruct it? with fragments from above? revelation from beyond?

"..the object itself can take on the role of providing identity for the subj ect." what if the subject is not fortunate enough to be surrounded by stable objects? How does Sartre's phenomenology dare presuppose such objects that give themselves to consciousnesses at different instants? What of all that epoche allows such?

"Deleuze's system" ...as an "attempt to construct a theory of the transcendental that maintains the differentiated structure of the transcendental field while removing the subject as the synthesizing agent"
? the transcendental field is differentiated from what?
If it is transcendent then how is its structure deduced/inferred?
Who performs the deduction? the subject? how if it cannot even synthesize?