Lia’s Reviews > Heidegger: Thinking of Being > Status Update
Lia
is on page 25 of 240
If I have to explain Heidegger to a 5 year old, this is the book I’d use.
Also good pre-reading if you don’t mind spoilers. I skimmed this before starting B&T and it helped me contextualize things. So this is kind of a rereading for me.
Helpful comm on p25
— Sep 13, 2018 03:24PM
Also good pre-reading if you don’t mind spoilers. I skimmed this before starting B&T and it helped me contextualize things. So this is kind of a rereading for me.
Helpful comm on p25
this way of being is fundamentally unlike other ways of being. As we saw in ¶6, ignoring this distinction is the original sin
Like flag
Lia’s Previous Updates
Lia
is on page 48 of 240
Rereading again, this is my fav:
Being and Time begins by quoting a great philosophical authority not for his knowledge but for his perplexity, then tells us that we don’t understand the question, and demonstrates this by giving us the answer which means nothing to us at this point.
— Jan 18, 2019 05:44AM
Being and Time begins by quoting a great philosophical authority not for his knowledge but for his perplexity, then tells us that we don’t understand the question, and demonstrates this by giving us the answer which means nothing to us at this point.
Lia
is on page 48 of 240
I was already thinking H is being very repetitive, and then I get this:
we have run through the three facets of being-in-the-world, thus completing its initial interpretation ... now we begin turning the Hermeneutic Spiral by returning to these ideas at a deeper level.
So, more repetition. Thanks for the headsup.
— Sep 13, 2018 08:15PM
we have run through the three facets of being-in-the-world, thus completing its initial interpretation ... now we begin turning the Hermeneutic Spiral by returning to these ideas at a deeper level.
So, more repetition. Thanks for the headsup.
Lia
is on page 26 of 240
Stuck wondering whether Dasein is also a corporeal thing. Relevant comm:
if existentialia and categories are as radically different as Heidegger says, then ... “Being-in ... a state of Dasein’s Being ... cannot think of it as the Being-present-at-hand of some corporeal Thing (such as a human body) ‘in’ an entity which is present-at-hand”
Cleary Bitw is a state. Does that rule out corporeality of Dasein?
— Sep 13, 2018 03:31PM
if existentialia and categories are as radically different as Heidegger says, then ... “Being-in ... a state of Dasein’s Being ... cannot think of it as the Being-present-at-hand of some corporeal Thing (such as a human body) ‘in’ an entity which is present-at-hand”
Cleary Bitw is a state. Does that rule out corporeality of Dasein?
