K.’s Reviews > It Had to Be You > Status Update
K.
is on page 161 of 376
These 2 are a train-wreck of bad signals & lack of "actual" communication!They jump to every wrong conclusion imaginable about each other!
— May 02, 2010 06:41PM
2 likes · Like flag
K.’s Previous Updates
K.
is on page 28 of 376
I've heard people say they didn't like this book because of Phoebee (the h.). What the?? After that AWFUL childhood? How is that possible?
— May 01, 2010 10:00PM
Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
new_user
(last edited May 03, 2010 07:18PM)
(new)
May 03, 2010 03:35PM
Sorry, what were you saying? I was distracted by the giant bosoms on the cover. LOL. What the heck. Who was in charge of that decision?
reply
|
flag
new_user wrote: "Sorry, what were you saying? I was distracted by the giant busoms on the cover. LOL. What the heck. Who was in charge of that decision?"ROFL
Re: wrong conclusions...I hate that! I've had this one on my short list to read for a while but I'm not so anxious to try it now.
I always knew I was never meant to read this book ...
Hold on ladies . . . I just finished this book, and am about to give it a 4.5*! No kidding - I stayed up last night until 2 a.m. finishing it! No book has kept me awake reading that late for some time . . . EVEN the 5* reads (I'll explain the 1/2* problem later)! This one is worth your time!K.
