Scott Hayden’s Reviews > Blacklisted!: Hollywood, the Cold War, and the First Amendment > Status Update
Scott Hayden
is on page 32 of 176
Although the author does not use footnotes, he does list sources for quotes. For other claims and accusations, however, he gives no sources. For example, he claims that the real motive behind Jack Warner's "friendly" witness testimony was to smear screen writers whose guild had demanded more money for writers than "conservative...moguls" wanted to pay. No source cited for this.
— May 16, 2020 07:18PM
Like flag
Scott’s Previous Updates
Scott Hayden
is on page 60 of 176
Brilliant point made by "Eric Johnston, president of the Motion Picture Association of America.... It was impossible for the film industry to defend itself against a generalization."
A theme of the book is voiced through actress Myrna Loy, "We question the right of Congress to ask any man what he thinks on political issues."
Reminds me of the CA exec who had to resign because of his stance on proposition 8
— May 16, 2020 07:56PM
A theme of the book is voiced through actress Myrna Loy, "We question the right of Congress to ask any man what he thinks on political issues."
Reminds me of the CA exec who had to resign because of his stance on proposition 8
Scott Hayden
is on page 54 of 176
Through the mouth of one of the "unfriendly' nineteen, the author admits more oppression by the Soviets.
At the same time, this point is well made: that the antics of HUAC seem just as oppressive.
— May 16, 2020 07:46PM
At the same time, this point is well made: that the antics of HUAC seem just as oppressive.
Scott Hayden
is on page 44 of 176
Author, Larry Brimner, lists various congressional committees investigating threats in a time of rising Fascism, Nazism, and Communism. Some of these committee members made accusations, which opponents said were unsubstantiated.
— May 16, 2020 07:36PM
Scott Hayden
is on page 36 of 176
Thirty-six pages in, the author finally acknowledges that Russia's communist revolution was violent. Yet, within a paragraph he plays down that violence by claiming that a special Senate committee was responsible for "painting communism and communists as barbaric because of the violence that had occurred during the Russian Revolution."
— May 16, 2020 07:27PM
Scott Hayden
is starting
The only thing the author says about communism itself is that "the government owned all industries and property as part of its attempt to create a society where everyone was equal; private ownership of property was forbidden." That's it. No admission of the millions imprisoned, tortured, enslaved, and killed under communist rule. What is this author up to?
— May 15, 2020 07:40PM
Scott Hayden
is starting
Disappointed. The beginning makes the "Red Scare" sound like nothing more than social hysteria. Neither on the inside front flap, nor in the introduction is any mention of the USSR's betrayal of the allies in its refusal to release East Germany from its grasp. The author does not acknowledge USSR take over of eastern bloc, nor the violent suppression of anyone who might even hint at disagreeing. I'm disturbed
— May 15, 2020 07:38PM

