Meredith Holley’s Reviews > Dispute Resolution: Examples & Explanations > Status Update

Meredith Holley
Meredith Holley is on page 215 of 340
I'm re-writing this book as a romance novel: "The judge's throbbing . . . gavel sent the parties begging for "mediation."
Jun 17, 2010 07:38PM
Dispute Resolution: Examples & Explanations

1 like ·  flag

Meredith’s Previous Updates

Meredith Holley
Meredith Holley is on page 12 of 340
Can you say "it would be against your interests to buy your second favorite car for $21,000, unless there is something important at stake" (would/is)? Or do you have to say "would/was"? I suddenly got really confused. It's would/was, right?
Jul 20, 2010 03:59PM
Dispute Resolution: Examples & Explanations


Meredith Holley
Meredith Holley is on page 100 of 340
I love "fisticuffs," but I don't think it's okay to use the word twice in one chapter. hmmm.
Jul 14, 2010 04:56PM
Dispute Resolution: Examples & Explanations


Meredith Holley
Meredith Holley is on page 200 of 340
Why is dwarfs the plural of dwarf? Why not dwarves? I know there's probably no answer, but I have to ask.
Jun 15, 2010 11:23AM
Dispute Resolution: Examples & Explanations


Meredith Holley
Meredith Holley is on page 18 of 340
Unfortunately, this might be a boring book. I didn't expect that because one of my favorite professors co-wrote it. Some people are so much better at speaking than writing, but I didn't expect that here.
Jun 10, 2010 09:57AM
Dispute Resolution: Examples & Explanations


Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Eh?Eh! (new)

Eh?Eh! HAH! Looks like your mind is wandering. Although the wording would make the Romance novel connection hard, uh, to ignore.


message 2: by Meredith (last edited Jun 18, 2010 12:07AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Meredith Holley Yes, the first edition is a little dry, so we thought a second edition might benefit from caressing before we slowly unfold its petals and thrust in some new language. Sorry, this is getting gross.


message 3: by Eh?Eh! (new)

Eh?Eh! Hahaa, no, you're a considerate editor. ;o)


message 4: by Meredith (last edited Jun 18, 2010 02:26PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Meredith Holley Well, it's not really about the length of the book, you know, but the way it's, um, written.


message 5: by Eh?Eh! (new)

Eh?Eh! Indeed. The arguments should cry out with ecstatic, er, consistency.


message 6: by Buck (new)

Buck Meredith wrote: "Well, it's not really about the length of the book, you know, but the way it's, um, written."

I always thought that was just something editors told writers to make them feel better.


back to top