KeyForLocked’s Reviews > Difference and Givenness: Deleuze's Transcendental Empiricism and the Ontology of Immanence > Status Update

How are you finding this?

Ahh……Lib-gen，don’t you know it at all？That's incredible to us Chinese，We must be pirates of internet in such an weird country. And as a pirate，I’ve got Lapoujade and Clet-Martin from other resource.

Haha, no no, I mean, are you enjoying this/do you like the approach of the book? Sorry lol.

My apologize，even english is difficult for me so that misunderstanding your language happened to me.

Of course,this anayltic approach (or writting style?) caught me so, but I think Bryant lacks some ambitious of provoke,which makes his writing and intention can not follow his target,and his target can not follow Deleuze so. The argument he reconstucted is explicit enough but arbitrary(may not fidle to Deleuze) and even weak(for his lack of ambitious)

But after all,this is excellent book for every apprenticeship in Deleuze,this approach which did not only accept but also show us the argument is illuminous for the follow deleuzian, although I can not accept Bryant's inability of logical inference showed by his blog and own original works,his ability to Making it Explicit impressed me much,really.
I think this might be best door to PHILOSOPHY of Deleuze because of his friendly writting.

Awkward English writing,forgive me.

No problems, I understand what you mean. Yea, I think this is still the best introduction to Deleuze because of it's clarity and rigor in providing argument. But I know what you mean about lacking somewhat in ambition.

Happy to see that you read the books I suggested!