August Denys’s Reviews > The Morals of the Market: Human Rights and the Rise of Neoliberalism > Status Update

It is interesting to see the development of the UDHR along with the strange lengths the Neoliberal advocates went to undermine them. The UDHR had problems, but the Neolibs were wrong (surprise) in their criticisms. Also... Mises considered Mill the greatest advocate of Socialism, not Marx... and we basically live in the world the Neolibs created... great.

The introduction itself could be a paper that people should read. The Neoliberal thinkers (as well as Chicago School and possibly James Buchanan) tried to pass their ideology as apolitical and amoral. Amoral in the sense that this was not something that could be disputed morally. There is a short but brilliant section that compares the Young Marx's critique of Liberal Values to the Neoliberals.