Status Update

Ipsa is 52% done

the references of abstract noun clauses don't have any truth value but only a thought. for were the reference its truth value, then that truth value should potentially affect the truth value (the reference) of the whole sentence. Point in Case: 'Copernicus believed that the planetary orbits are circles’ and ‘Copernicus believed that the apparent motion of the sun is produced by the real motion of the Earth.’

— Feb 03, 2021 07:09AM

1 like · Like flag

Ipsa’s Previous Updates

Ipsa is 55% done

i wanna go back in time and murder Frege.

— Feb 04, 2021 02:24AM

Ipsa is 52% done

Since grammarians classify subordinate clauses in accordance with parts of speech, like noun clauses, adjective clauses, and so on, we might then think that the reference of a subordinate clause is NOT a truth value like for full sentences but rather is more like the reference for nouns, adjectives, and so on, which in that case would be just a part of a thought.

— Feb 03, 2021 04:25AM

Ipsa is 50% done

— Feb 03, 2021 12:46AM

Ipsa is 40% done

I do not understand what Frege means when he says judgments are distinctions of parts within truth values. What are the parts and what are the distinctions? GODDAMNIT, I HATE LOGICIANS !!!!!!1!

— Feb 02, 2021 05:17AM

Ipsa is 38% done

The relation between thought and truth value isn't one of subject and predicate but of sense and reference. I think, I THINK, that is because that would involve us predicating the truth or falsity to the thought. And were this so, that means a new concept would be born from that predication. therefore, no new concept=no relation of predication. (?)

— Feb 02, 2021 05:11AM