Paige McLoughlin’s Reviews > The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory according to the Everett Interpretation > Status Update

ok someone has got to do gritty grunt work with math equations and not handwave Everett interpretations but I wish he'd do a popular work.

Although the author likes a position that I dislike it is an easier read for normies (nonphysicists, nonacademics) https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/5...

He has a good nose for sussing out the two main philosophical approaches to the measurement problem of QM. The humble epistemological approach and going big with the metaphysically speculative approach. I if you haven't already noticed am a speculative loud mouth and not careful.

funking Boltzmann-like equations with exponentials in the denominator who are you trying to impress. I know philosophers have insecurities. But I believe you, dude, you know physics.

I get it. this for an academic audience like your buddies at Oxford but you should try to write for people outside of that or your book will end up collecting dust in an academic library like some lost Ph.D. thesis. you probably worked hard to write an extra mile to make it digestible by normies might have had a wider audience. Do you think you the Keynes of the quantum? Make it like "the consequences of peace".

More Schroedinger formulas. I am glad Wallace segregated it in a gray box that the reader could ignore but a teaching moment is available there to explain and integrate for the lay reader with a little digestive aid give a layperson a more robust understanding of his argument. I dunno I didn't write the f--ing thing so who am I to judge but I do.