Erickson’s Reviews > Quantum Fields in Curved Space > Status Update
Erickson
is on page 78 of 352
Skimmed through the adiabatic approximation in Section 3.5-3.6. I really don't understand what they are saying for some reason, nor why is adiabatic approximation good in this case. Worse still, I don't know why the "conformally coupled" case in Eq. 3.99-3.100 is like that; massive field equation is not conformally invariant, so I don't see how that result can be obtained.
— Apr 18, 2021 11:35PM
Like flag
Erickson’s Previous Updates
Erickson
is on page 123 of 352
Finished Section 5.1 somewhat; it's mostly just derivations for FRW case and it's pointless to memorize the details since it's as pointless as memorizing components of Riemann tensor. The main takeaway is that the conformal weight does not vanish in 4 dimensions.
— May 13, 2021 11:46PM
Erickson
is on page 118 of 352
Finished Chapter 4; I need to re-think about the Unruh effect part where the analyticity argument has been used. It's not clear to me why that argument implies particle creation.
— May 11, 2021 01:02PM
Erickson
is on page 102 of 352
Finished 4.1-4.3. It's mostly dirty calculations so there is nothing much to learn from the gory details. However, one thing that bugged me was the method to obtain the Wightman function via method of images; I know that if we found the right one, it -has- to be; but I don't know how this would work for other boundary conditions.
— Apr 20, 2021 10:32PM
Erickson
is on page 88 of 352
Finished Chapter 3, skimming through higher spin cases. Moral of the story: this book is bad for learning; only good when you are sufficiently expert. Even for me who has some basics, going through this book is painful. It is true though that it is trying to be thorough (though I suspect now books by Parker and others are probably better)
— Apr 19, 2021 12:58PM
Erickson
is on page 66 of 352
Midway into Section 3.5 on adiabatic vacuum and finished 2D FRW example. Took me a while to realize that the "solvability" of the ODE of auxiliary function of conformal time relies on the nice property of the scale factor, and why the Bogoliubov coeff. looked like they did. I still struggle with those handwaving argument about "uncertainty" in particle number; they are so heuristic I had a hard time trusting it.
— Apr 17, 2021 09:28PM
Erickson
is on page 56 of 352
Finished the particle detector part (section 3.3). This time I tried to go through most of the calculations, and a nice surprise is a identity involving infinite sum equal to cosec(x). This is a nice result obtained from residue theorem in complex analysis.
— Apr 15, 2021 12:54PM
Erickson
is on page 45 of 352
Stopped at section 3.2. Need to try and understand what it means for a vacuum to be Poincare-invariant.
— Mar 28, 2021 09:31PM
Erickson
is on page 36 of 352
Finished skimming chapter 2. The path integral and Green's function section really requires familiarity with standard QFT so one cannot expect to understand this chapter completely without being familiar with (1) canonical quantization and (2) Green's functions and kernels of the wave equation or Dirac equation.
— Jan 26, 2021 03:15PM
Erickson
is on page 15 of 352
Restarting this for my comprehensive exams (first five chapters). I guess I find this book too old, but it is not a bad feeling especially when the authors actually tried to make this pedagogical (contrary to my original bias). I guess the laundry list of references are for exotic stuff. I should complement this with other resources just to be safe.
— Jan 10, 2021 09:48PM

