Pamela Nassar Altabcharani’s Reviews > The Lonely Letters > Status Update


flag

Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Pamela (new) - added it

Pamela Nassar Altabcharani "What intrigues me about all these folks is their desire for a vertical relationship with god over and against all other kinds of relationships, how there is a sorta necessity to renounce sociality, how there is a retreat, how there is a movement away from noise. Such an individual [monks], a self, a subject would would be rational, would be higher, than the base emotions, than the flesh. There was an assumption, a moving out from the flesh, a renunciation of the body, to produce this vertical relation." p. 23


message 2: by Pamela (new) - added it

Pamela Nassar Altabcharani "No fats, no fems" seems to be a rhetorical admission to and underscoring of the ways gender performance as well as the physical musculature of the body are ripe with social and sacred meaning. Similar to blackqueerness in a Black Christian imagination, fat and fem bodies intimate one that is out of control and given to excesses: it is a different rendering of a sinful body, yet equally engaged in discourse of pleasures, ecstasy, and behaviors of the nonnormative. [...] All this to say, I wonder about mortification of the flesh as a means of attempting an ideal of the religious, the spiritual, the set apart, mortification in order to have an experience of god. [...] What of those of us, in other words, that do not have to become or be initiated into such an experience of bodily pain but experience it as a grounding of being?" p.25-6


message 3: by Pamela (new) - added it

Pamela Nassar Altabcharani "So I'm totally uncomfortable with a kind of apocalypticism that seeks the destruction of the world because that --destroying the world, the earth-- has been the project and crowning achievement of western epistemological force, of western imperial-colonial farce."


message 4: by Pamela (new) - added it

Pamela Nassar Altabcharani “What we must work on, it seems to me, is not so much to liberate our desires but to make ourselves infinitely more susceptible to pleasure…” p. 29


back to top