Anurag’s Reviews > Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England, > Status Update
Like flag
Anurag’s Previous Updates
Anurag
is on page 248 of 423
Comparative reference groups are not chosen in accordance with the facts of inequality.
— Feb 22, 2022 07:30AM
Anurag
is on page 201 of 423
They confirms the finding that self-reported middle-class identity (self-rating) is tied with the support for the Conservative party.
— Feb 20, 2022 12:39PM
Anurag
is on page 195 of 423
Runciman warns that social attitudes to inequality cannot be claimed to be caused by the choice of a normative reference group.
— Feb 20, 2022 12:36PM
Anurag
is on page 194 of 423
The survey relies on asking consumers to suggest what they would mean by people like themselves.
— Feb 20, 2022 12:35PM
Anurag
is on page 181 of 423
Runciman considers the manual/non-manual distinction relevant in the context of England.
— Feb 20, 2022 12:29PM
Anurag
is on page 180 of 423
One cannot after all ask the consumer what her comparative, normative and membership reference groups are.
— Feb 20, 2022 12:24PM
Anurag
is on page 58 of 423
Runciman argues that the role of subjective evaluation of one's prospects may be disregarded in the way assignment to a class is recorded in the surveys.
— Feb 20, 2022 12:21PM
Anurag
is on page 43 of 423
Weber/Marx consider class-identity as the reference group - not pertaining to the social identity - but in a means-of-production sense.
— Feb 20, 2022 12:14PM

