Moses > Status Update

Moses
Moses is on page 140 of 296
I'm perplexed by the author's annotations on the violin plots. He seems not to confuse mean and mode when he states that the counties won by Clinton are distributed "around a mean of 52%." I was so surprised by this claim that I downloaded the data myself, re-taught myself how to analyze it in R, and found a mean of 58%. Just because the peak of the curve is at 52% doesn't mean that's the mean! Smh
May 19, 2022 05:56PM
Thematic Mapping: 101 Inspiring Ways to Visualise Empirical Data

flag

Moses’s Previous Updates

Moses
Moses is on page 156 of 296
So many weird little errors in this book! In a map (p156) that shows line graphs for each state's vote totals over time, Minnesota goes red three times in the past half-century. In reality, while Minnesota has had several close results, it hasn't voted for a Republican president since Nixon in 1972. I'm confused about how this error even happened - the data is correct on other maps in the same book.
May 21, 2022 01:21PM
Thematic Mapping: 101 Inspiring Ways to Visualise Empirical Data


Moses
Moses is on page 135 of 296
Gosh, this is a sloppy book! The snake chart (p134) ranks Utah as bluer than WI in 2016, sorting the states by GOP vote % rather than margin of victory. Trump got 46% of UT votes, but won by 18 points due to a strong 3rd party showing. Not only does the author fail to note this peculiarity, he even describes Utah as one of "the states with the most marginal results that went Trump's way," which is simply inaccurate.
May 19, 2022 04:45PM
Thematic Mapping: 101 Inspiring Ways to Visualise Empirical Data


Moses
Moses is on page 127 of 296
May 16, 2022 06:48PM
Thematic Mapping: 101 Inspiring Ways to Visualise Empirical Data


Moses
Moses is 40% done
I was really excited for this book, but it's been a letdown so far. A lot of surprisingly poorly designed maps, dry/clunky text, and poor editing. The map on page 113 (which I'm currently on) is shockingly inaccurate - nearly every state is the wrong color based on the key. Nevada and Pennsylvania, for instance, are shown as having margins of victory above 30% in 2016. Disappointing.
May 16, 2022 06:34PM
Thematic Mapping: 101 Inspiring Ways to Visualise Empirical Data


No comments have been added yet.