Anouk > Status Update
Anouk
is on page 20 of 144
TyLean’s review is very apt. I couldnt comment on their review.
This was written for the audience of 1960s so the new edition by The History Press could have provided footnote annotations explaining the assumed references. For example, what does the author mean by “Sickertian London” on page 19?
— Sep 18, 2022 02:54AM
This was written for the audience of 1960s so the new edition by The History Press could have provided footnote annotations explaining the assumed references. For example, what does the author mean by “Sickertian London” on page 19?
Like flag
Anouk’s Previous Updates
Anouk
is on page 20 of 144
Lots of lovely quotes but I do agree with TyLean’s review.
So far, my thoughts: This was written for the audience of 1960s so the new edition by The History Press could have provided footnote annotations explaining the assumed references. For example, what does the author mean by “Sickertian London” on page 19?
— Sep 18, 2022 02:56AM
So far, my thoughts: This was written for the audience of 1960s so the new edition by The History Press could have provided footnote annotations explaining the assumed references. For example, what does the author mean by “Sickertian London” on page 19?
