Stephen’s Reviews > Unreasonable Faith: How William Lane Craig Overstates the Case for Christianity > Status Update

Craig: "If God did not exist, objective moral values and duties would not exist"
also Craig: "God's existence is metaphysically necessary" - so the above statement has an impossible antecedent
also Craig: "Statements with impossible antecedents are nonsensical"
Is it possible that William Lane Craig is just a clown in an apologist suit?

Done with part one. I expect many would find the choice of starting with Craig's views on the philosophy of time and of language to be a very hard sell, but I do think it demonstrates just how weird our man Craig is.