Stefan G’s Reviews > The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine: A History of Settler-Colonial Conquest and Resistance, 1917–2017 > Status Update

would like to look into why viewing the issue as a national conflict has taken precedence over its colonial nature; is this something that benefits the occupation and its supporters & beneficiaries?

what are the motivations for shifting the world’s focus from the colonial issue to the national one?

lots of emphasis in the introduction of the issue of Palestine being both a colonial and national conflict

would like to reflect on and further understand the distinction between it being a colonial conflict as well as a national one

the author also states that the focus of the book is to examine the colonial nature over the national one due to the colonial one generally being under appreciated