Sarah’s Reviews > The Case for Books: Past, Present, and Future > Status Update
Sarah
is on page 21 of 256
War of public vs. private use of books on the Internet: Line clearly drawn pro-open access and anti-private interest.
I predict that much of the first two sections of this will be mostly obsolete.
— Jul 10, 2023 01:27PM
I predict that much of the first two sections of this will be mostly obsolete.
Like flag
Sarah’s Previous Updates
Sarah
is on page 109 of 256
In 2009 he says, “Today we rely on digitization , even though digital copies are more vulnerable than microfilm to decay and obsolescence.”
In 2023 I think that is an extreme exaggeration.
— Jul 16, 2023 10:15AM
In 2023 I think that is an extreme exaggeration.
Sarah
is on page 109 of 256
I feel like I wasted my time reading the first two (of three) sections…. It’s basically a detailed description of the author’s desire to disseminate academic info. for researchers via e-books… in the first decade of the twenty-first century. Twenty years later it’s virtually obsolete.
— Jul 15, 2023 02:10PM
Sarah
is on page 71 of 256
He appears to be focused primarily in academics and research libraries.
— Jul 13, 2023 08:50AM
Sarah
is on page 43 of 256
I’m hoping this whole book isn’t a diatribe against “Google Book Search” (which has evolved into Google Play… hence the “obsolete” info….)
— Jul 11, 2023 05:53PM
