Davey Ermold’s Reviews > LOTUS: A Free Grace Response to TULIP > Status Update
Davey Ermold
is on page 51 of 301
This book is well on its way to two stars. The author has significant holes in logic and reasoning. Some of the terminology he uses indicates a lack of understanding of key theological concepts (e.g., “Golden Rule of Interpretation” instead of “the analogy of faith”). Aside from questionable theology, the argumentation is lacking in significant ways.
— Feb 18, 2024 11:05AM
1 like · Like flag
Davey’s Previous Updates
Davey Ermold
is on page 107 of 301
Two stars may be too generous. Logical fallacy of appeal to emotion: “If that doesn’t make your stomach turn, you may need to prick yourself with a needle to see if you are alive.”
Throw in an obliteration of propitiation, failure to consider context when it comes to “the world,” and an absurd claim that unbelief, not sin, is what keeps us from eternal life, and this book contains significant error.
— Feb 18, 2024 06:22PM
Throw in an obliteration of propitiation, failure to consider context when it comes to “the world,” and an absurd claim that unbelief, not sin, is what keeps us from eternal life, and this book contains significant error.
