Khari’s Reviews > Predestination: The American Career of a Contentious Doctrine > Status Update
Khari
is on page 127 of 309
Furthermore, why do we demand it of ourselves?
I think that all denominations are wrong, somewhere, because no human is omniscient, and no human can fully, completely understand the revelation of a God that is. I find that existential uncertainty to be actually comforting, because it implies that a range of creeds are acceptable in God's eyes.
Others find it horrifying, because they assume only one creed is.
— Apr 01, 2024 03:49PM
I think that all denominations are wrong, somewhere, because no human is omniscient, and no human can fully, completely understand the revelation of a God that is. I find that existential uncertainty to be actually comforting, because it implies that a range of creeds are acceptable in God's eyes.
Others find it horrifying, because they assume only one creed is.
Like flag
Khari’s Previous Updates
Khari
is on page 188 of 309
"Regarding the similar debates in Augustine's own day, historian Elizabeth Clark once quipped that at no time before or since had a group of celibate men been so concerned about babies."
Snicker.
I want to read this woman now. That's hilarious.
And true!
— May 02, 2024 04:52PM
Snicker.
I want to read this woman now. That's hilarious.
And true!
Khari
is on page 158 of 309
It's odd. Theusen clearly defines many terms I've never heard of like supralapsarian and missouri Synod...but he never explains other terms, like what does Reformed mean? And what does Pietist mean? Reformed in particular is an annoying one because it seems like every theological work defines it differently, so I have no idea what it means. It doesn't seem to mean merely 'part of, or holding to the reformation'.
— Apr 15, 2024 02:47PM
