Debbie Roth’s Reviews > Dangerous Injustice: How Democrats Weaponized the DOJ to Protect Biden and Persecute Trump > Status Update

Sweeney was a very interesting guest on Robert G's show where they talked about Federal Prosecution of Spying and How the Prosecution of POTUS Trump was complete BS... As the law they cited for the judge who wrote the search warrant Did Not Apply to a POTUS. (even former; if he is).

BTW I think the quote you mention about Prosecutor mission of fair justice in Trump's case is BS. And these folks think they can do Anything. The worse thing (on the show was Sweeney said the lawfare by the legal system Can't be prosecuted.

Mike wrote: "Sweeney was a very interesting guest on Robert G's show where they talked about Federal Prosecution of Spying and How the Prosecution of POTUS Trump was complete BS... As the law they cited for the..."

Robert G? Who is that?

Mike wrote: "Sweeney was a very interesting guest on Robert G's show where they talked about Federal Prosecution of Spying and How the Prosecution of POTUS Trump was complete BS... As the law they cited for the..."

When applying for warrants with fraudulent supporting documents, like what happened in Russiagate when feds applied for FISA, it’s a legal version of the wrap up smear where a falsified story is released by a “trusted source,” and then picked up by numerous news and online content creators so it gets repeated so many times by sources many trust, consumers of content believe it to be true, ie if you repeat a lie enough, it soon is accepted as truth because so many endorsed it by virtue of publishing it. In the case of applying for FISA warrants in particular, agencies like the FBI are generally trusted by judges. So when they go in for the judge’s signature these agencies’ very reputations will act in the same way as the outlets that run the false stories in the wrap up smears, the agencies’ reputations amplify their applications enough that the judge just signs off on the warrants, and if it weren’t investigated by Congressional committees with independent news sources spreading the information, leading to honest content creators doing their own investigations, we might never have learned the supporting documents were a politically motivated house of cards constructed by bad actors that extended to the highest reaches of the government, with agendas to interfere with elections, among other things. It looks like “agency capture,” when in fact it’s “branch of government” capture, judiciary, congressional, and executive branches. I’m guessing Sweeney was saying “lawfare can’t be prosecuted” was in the context of existing laws and executive orders, many set up to protect agencies. It’s possible individuals could be prosecuted for lying on warrant applications, ignoring subpoenas, and lying when testifying under oath. I hope someone thought to ask Sweeney the follow up question to him saying lawfare can’t be prosecuted, “What do we need to do to change that?”

Yes, Sweeney was echoing what I've heard every law show say about the justice system (esp. the judicary (judges and justices)) are all protected and Assume to be seeking truth... and all lawyers are acting as advocate (within the established law)... i.e. an officer of the courts. But there's no consideration of the justice system being weaponized And there being criminal abuse of the power of that system. And that's What's wrong with the system (right now). I think, Legally, the legal system can/could be prosecuted With Impeachment.. you can't indict a judge/prosecutor until/unless you remove them from the system... at that point, they become a citizen subject to prosecution.