Chet Patterson’s Reviews > Five Proofs of the Existence of God > Status Update

Chet Patterson
Chet Patterson is on page 29 of 330
Jan 17, 2025 10:44AM
Five Proofs of the Existence of God

1 like ·  flag

Chet’s Previous Updates

Chet Patterson
Chet Patterson is on page 249 of 330
Apr 20, 2025 11:28AM
Five Proofs of the Existence of God


Chet Patterson
Chet Patterson is on page 249 of 330
Apr 17, 2025 07:27AM
Five Proofs of the Existence of God


Chet Patterson
Chet Patterson is on page 147 of 330
Mar 27, 2025 09:08AM
Five Proofs of the Existence of God


Chet Patterson
Chet Patterson is on page 117 of 330
Mar 23, 2025 09:24AM
Five Proofs of the Existence of God


Chet Patterson
Chet Patterson is on page 87 of 330
Feb 01, 2025 10:58AM
Five Proofs of the Existence of God


Chet Patterson
Chet Patterson is on page 69 of 330
Jan 20, 2025 09:03AM
Five Proofs of the Existence of God


Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Kyle (new)

Kyle McD What do you think?


message 2: by Chet (new) - added it

Chet Patterson Kyle wrote: "What do you think?"

An interlocutor on TikTok recommended this book to me. He was using an argument from Feser but was having a little trouble articulating it, so I decided to give Feser a read. I'm still in the first (Aristotelian) proof, but so far I'm tracking his line of reasoning pretty well. It starts with an informal version of the argument and then moves to a formal articulation, so it is easy enough to understand but retains the necessary technical nuance.

He addresses some hypothetical objections to the argument, however, I don't think he sufficiently defends the premise that concurrent hierarchical contingencies demand a purely actual actualizer (which is my main objection, and naturally a necessary step for the argument to work). Like, I see how one could come to that conclusion, but I don't see any compelling reason that one /ought/ to accept it rather than just reject it.


back to top