Mark’s Reviews > The Transformation of European Politics 1763-1848 > Status Update
Mark
is 56% done
I will look back on this book as critical in my historical understanding, I wish I had tried reading it in college. Unbelievably good, totally ignores the military part of the Napoleonic wars in a way that makes you wonder why anyone talks about the battles or campaigns.
— Jan 26, 2025 11:42PM
1 like · Like flag
Mark’s Previous Updates
Mark
is 75% done
Russia and Britain as moderating dual hegemons, not directly competing, but managing competition effectively. 1815-1818
— Feb 25, 2025 04:13PM
Mark
is 72% done
The concert of Europe established (finished with the Vienna conference) The long 19 century exiting its adolescence. The New Imperalist balance of power entrenched, youthful. The trenches and 20th century struggling to be born, a glimmer in the eye. Austria’s insecurity simply postponed, the assassination of the archduke almost obvious 100 years beforehand
— Feb 17, 2025 11:30PM
Mark
is 53% done
The strain of war makes the balance of power rear its head again (getting nearer to the end of Nap Wars)
— Dec 11, 2024 06:58PM
Mark
is 43% done
The underlying logic of constant competition leads to its natural break from a revolutionary (in IR terms ‘revisionist’ actor) government and individual (Napoleon) who has maximalist goals and no commitment to collective security, due to France’s inherently insecure position in the prior balance. British and Russians continue to waffle to stop an existential crisis from France, Austria/cent europe the victim
— Nov 25, 2024 05:31PM
Mark
is on page 314 of 916
France consolidates, Prussia makes an effort only after Austria is subdued and Russia is reluctant to help, far too late. Berlin degree (confidential system established) analyzed in detail as part of the overarching structure of French domination of allies. Persistent theme: three hegemonic powers (Russia, France, Britain) constantly jockeying: France escalating, Britain reluctant, Russia balancing (late)
— Oct 06, 2024 04:31PM
Mark
is 36% done
At 1806, Napoleon is a tremendous figure but the book does a good job analyzing all the diplomats and foreign ministries and national strategies rather than focusing on him. He’s a little one dimensional in his pursuit of open ended dominance in this reading, but it feeds well into the thesis of the ‘destruction’ of 18th century politics over the course of the first decade of the 1800’s.
— Oct 04, 2024 02:34PM
Mark
is 31% done
Book is a slog. Up to 1803/1804 and analysis of British grand strategy + russian grand strategy re: continuing in the war and trying to balance against France. It's good but There's still 550 pages left. Will probably pick up after 1815 Congress of Vienna and be more interesting/less 'interwar/war/interwar/war' like it is now during the coalition wars w nap
— Jun 28, 2024 03:15PM

