Robert Paul Wolff
Born
in New York City, The United States
December 27, 1933
Died
January 06, 2025
Genre
Influences
Immauel Kant, Karl Marx
Robert Paul Wolff isn't a Goodreads Author
(yet),
but they
do have a blog,
so here are some recent posts imported from
their feed.
|
In Defense of Anarchism
—
published
1970
—
13 editions
|
|
|
A Critique of Pure Tolerance
by
—
published
1965
—
21 editions
|
|
|
ten-great-works-of-philosophy
by
—
published
1969
—
14 editions
|
|
|
About Philosophy (8th Edition)
—
published
1976
—
30 editions
|
|
|
Moneybags Must Be So Lucky: On the Literary Structure of Capital
—
published
1988
—
7 editions
|
|
|
The Poverty of Liberalism
—
published
1969
—
9 editions
|
|
|
Autobiography of an Ex-White Man: Learning a New Master Narrative for America
—
published
2005
—
9 editions
|
|
|
Understanding Rawls: A Reconstruction and Critique of a Theory of Justice
—
published
1977
—
6 editions
|
|
|
Understanding Marx: A Reconstruction and Critique of Capital
—
published
1984
—
7 editions
|
|
|
The Ideal of the University
—
published
1971
—
11 editions
|
|
“Both Marx and Nietzsche understood that moral outrage is the last resort of the powerless. That is why Marx refused to issue moral condemnations of capitalism, preferring instead to lay out, calmly and ruthlessly, his reasons for believing that it is destined to be replaced by socialism. And that is why Nietzsche mocks Christianity for portraying its crucified Saviour as bait wriggling on a hook to catch unsuspecting souls.”
―
―
“An authoritative command must … be distinguished from a persuasive argument. When I am commanded to do something, I may choose to comply even though I am not being threatened, because I am brought to believe that it is something which I ought to do. If that is the case, then I am not, strictly speaking, obeying a command, but rather acknowledging the force or rightness of a prescription. … But the person himself [sic] has no authority—or, to be more precise, my complying with his command does not constitute an acknowledgment on my part of any such authority.”
― In Defense of Anarchism
― In Defense of Anarchism
“Since the responsible man arrives at moral decisions which he expresses to himself in the form of imperatives, we may say that he gives laws to himself, or is self-legislating. In short, he is autonomous. As Kant argued, moral autonomy is a combination of freedom and responsibility; it is a submission to laws which one has made for oneself. The autonomous man, insofar as he is autonomous, is not subject to the will of another. He may do what another tells him, but not because he has been told to do it. He is therefore, in the political sense of the word, free.”
― In Defense of Anarchism
― In Defense of Anarchism



























