Crime and Cask's Blog
November 24, 2023
New Release Alert: 'Defending Alex Murdaugh' Dominates Crime and Evidence Charts for 6 Weeks!"
Hey Crime and Cask readers, have you heard the buzz about the latest gripping release that's been dominating the charts for six whole weeks? Well, hold onto your sleuthing hats because 'Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt' is creating waves in the world of crime and evidence analysis!
Available now on Amazon, this riveting book by Crime and Cask has been holding strong at an impressive #6 spot in the Crime and Evidence category. But that's not all—readers are raving about it across platforms like Goodreads, Amazon, and Barnes & Noble!
With an incredible blend of meticulous investigation and captivating storytelling, 'Defending Alex Murdaugh' dives into the intricacies of a case that challenges conventional perceptions. Its compelling narrative skillfully navigates the complexities, leaving readers at the edge of their seats as they dissect each piece of evidence alongside the defense.
The book has garnered a string of high ratings and positive reviews on various platforms, showcasing its impact on readers and their fascination with its compelling narrative. From thought-provoking discussions on Goodreads to glowing testimonials on Amazon and Barnes & Noble, the consensus is clear: 'Defending Alex Murdaugh' is a must-read for any true crime enthusiast.
So, if you haven't already dived into this thought-provoking and gripping exploration, now's the time! Join the ranks of those captivated by this compelling narrative and immerse yourself in the world of 'Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt'.
Don't miss out on this incredible journey into the heart of the legal system and the complexities of innocence, guilt, and reasonable doubt. Get your hands on a copy today and experience the thrill that everyone's talking about!
Grab your copy now on Amazon and other major retailers, and let the pages of 'Defending Alex Murdaugh' unravel a mystery that will keep you guessing until the very end!
Happy reading, detectives!Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt
Available now on Amazon, this riveting book by Crime and Cask has been holding strong at an impressive #6 spot in the Crime and Evidence category. But that's not all—readers are raving about it across platforms like Goodreads, Amazon, and Barnes & Noble!
With an incredible blend of meticulous investigation and captivating storytelling, 'Defending Alex Murdaugh' dives into the intricacies of a case that challenges conventional perceptions. Its compelling narrative skillfully navigates the complexities, leaving readers at the edge of their seats as they dissect each piece of evidence alongside the defense.
The book has garnered a string of high ratings and positive reviews on various platforms, showcasing its impact on readers and their fascination with its compelling narrative. From thought-provoking discussions on Goodreads to glowing testimonials on Amazon and Barnes & Noble, the consensus is clear: 'Defending Alex Murdaugh' is a must-read for any true crime enthusiast.
So, if you haven't already dived into this thought-provoking and gripping exploration, now's the time! Join the ranks of those captivated by this compelling narrative and immerse yourself in the world of 'Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt'.
Don't miss out on this incredible journey into the heart of the legal system and the complexities of innocence, guilt, and reasonable doubt. Get your hands on a copy today and experience the thrill that everyone's talking about!
Grab your copy now on Amazon and other major retailers, and let the pages of 'Defending Alex Murdaugh' unravel a mystery that will keep you guessing until the very end!
Happy reading, detectives!Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt
November 20, 2023
NBC Dateline Review | Alex Murdaugh
Considered a significant development in the Alex Murdaugh case, lead investigators from the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) have revealed for the first time on TV that their newly discovered video evidence placing Murdaugh at the scene of the murders of his wife Maggie and son Paul just six minutes before the crimes took place was the tipping point in their investigation
This revelation, which has not been previously disclosed on TV, cast doubt on Murdaugh's alibi about only being at the house. SLED Agent David Owen, who played a key role in the investigation, expressed his excitement upon uncovering the video evidence, stating, "I was really excited because I can prove that Alex was lying to me." This revelation, Owen believes, was a pivotal moment in the case, marking a turning point in the investigation.
Crime and Cask | Alex Murdaugh
However, a closer examination of the timeline presented by SLED raises concerns about the strength of their case. While the video evidence places Murdaugh at the crime scene at 8:44 pm, the prosecution asserts that Maggie and Paul were both shot around 8:50 pm, just six minutes later.
This narrow timeframe raises questions about Murdaugh's ability to commit the murders within such a short period, especially considering the lack of physical evidence linking him to the crime scene.
Moreover, the prosecution's narrative of Murdaugh as a calculating mastermind contrasts sharply with SLED Agent Ryan Kelly's description of Alex's seemingly inept attempt to stage his own suicide. Agent Kelly's account of the Mercedes SUV used in the incident, with its barely deflated tires and lack of visible obstructions, suggests a level of carelessness that is inconsistent with a meticulously planned murderer they described in Alex.
In light of these inconsistencies, the Dateline episode featuring interviews with SLED agents and Murdaugh's housekeeper Blanca Simpson appears to favor the prosecution's narrative, presenting Alex Murdaugh as a cunning killer, driven by financial motives.
However, the episode also includes Simpson's account of her interaction with Murdaugh regarding his clothes worn on the day of the murders. This interaction, which occurred on August 11, 2021, coincides with the day SLED Agent David Owen confronted Murdaugh about his clothing, leaving him unable to recall.
This sequence suggests that Murdaugh's inquiry about his clothes was likely prompted by Owen's questioning, rather than being a premeditated act to cover up his tracks.
While SLED investigators have undoubtedly conducted a thorough investigation, the emerging evidence raises questions about the strength of their case against Alex Murdaugh. The prosecution's narrative of a meticulously planned murder seems at odds with the inconsistencies in the timeline and the lack of physical evidence.
Alternative Theory
In addition to the inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, there are also alternative theories about the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. One theory suggests that Paul was hunted down and executed with his own guns to silence him about his involvement in a local unsolved murder. This theory is based on the fact that Paul was facing criminal charges in connection with Beach's death and that he was reportedly about to cooperate with investigators about the unsolved case.
Who is the person who was really close to the Murdaughs that connects the Murdaughs to the real killers? Who would also have a close relationship with Mallory Beach that would be hateful towards Paul? Connect these dots, and you have yourself the alleged killers of Paul and Maggie Murdaugh.
Because no one trades some financial crimes for a murder charge. But a clear motive to kill Paul would be to silence him to cover up a previous murder. That's a risk worth taking.
Look at how sloppy the murders were. Any good detective will tell you that Paul's shooting was from someone who was close to him but was extremely angry at Paul. They'll go on to tell you that Maggie's killing was wildly sloppy, and the shooter or shooters were taken by surprise by Maggie. Almost as if they thought Maggie went back to the house on the golf cart with Alex, just like Alex said he did under oath.
Crime and Cask | Alex Murdaugh
For those now intrigued by my assertions and clues, I urge you to go read my new book, Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt, available at Amazon and Barnes & Noble. It's rated 4.6 on Amazon and Goodreads because it was well-investigated, thought-out, and well-written. I use the prosecution's own evidence to prove to my readers that Alex Murdaugh not only did not commit these crimes, but in many cases, science and math prove he could not have even come close to doing it.
Conclusion
The murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh remain a complex and puzzling case. While SLED investigators have made significant progress in their investigation, there are still many unanswered questions. Further investigation is needed to uncover the truth behind these murders and ensure that justice is served in a second trial of Alex Murdaugh.Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt
This revelation, which has not been previously disclosed on TV, cast doubt on Murdaugh's alibi about only being at the house. SLED Agent David Owen, who played a key role in the investigation, expressed his excitement upon uncovering the video evidence, stating, "I was really excited because I can prove that Alex was lying to me." This revelation, Owen believes, was a pivotal moment in the case, marking a turning point in the investigation.
Crime and Cask | Alex Murdaugh
However, a closer examination of the timeline presented by SLED raises concerns about the strength of their case. While the video evidence places Murdaugh at the crime scene at 8:44 pm, the prosecution asserts that Maggie and Paul were both shot around 8:50 pm, just six minutes later.
This narrow timeframe raises questions about Murdaugh's ability to commit the murders within such a short period, especially considering the lack of physical evidence linking him to the crime scene.
Moreover, the prosecution's narrative of Murdaugh as a calculating mastermind contrasts sharply with SLED Agent Ryan Kelly's description of Alex's seemingly inept attempt to stage his own suicide. Agent Kelly's account of the Mercedes SUV used in the incident, with its barely deflated tires and lack of visible obstructions, suggests a level of carelessness that is inconsistent with a meticulously planned murderer they described in Alex.
In light of these inconsistencies, the Dateline episode featuring interviews with SLED agents and Murdaugh's housekeeper Blanca Simpson appears to favor the prosecution's narrative, presenting Alex Murdaugh as a cunning killer, driven by financial motives.
However, the episode also includes Simpson's account of her interaction with Murdaugh regarding his clothes worn on the day of the murders. This interaction, which occurred on August 11, 2021, coincides with the day SLED Agent David Owen confronted Murdaugh about his clothing, leaving him unable to recall.
This sequence suggests that Murdaugh's inquiry about his clothes was likely prompted by Owen's questioning, rather than being a premeditated act to cover up his tracks.
While SLED investigators have undoubtedly conducted a thorough investigation, the emerging evidence raises questions about the strength of their case against Alex Murdaugh. The prosecution's narrative of a meticulously planned murder seems at odds with the inconsistencies in the timeline and the lack of physical evidence.
Alternative Theory
In addition to the inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, there are also alternative theories about the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. One theory suggests that Paul was hunted down and executed with his own guns to silence him about his involvement in a local unsolved murder. This theory is based on the fact that Paul was facing criminal charges in connection with Beach's death and that he was reportedly about to cooperate with investigators about the unsolved case.
Who is the person who was really close to the Murdaughs that connects the Murdaughs to the real killers? Who would also have a close relationship with Mallory Beach that would be hateful towards Paul? Connect these dots, and you have yourself the alleged killers of Paul and Maggie Murdaugh.
Because no one trades some financial crimes for a murder charge. But a clear motive to kill Paul would be to silence him to cover up a previous murder. That's a risk worth taking.
Look at how sloppy the murders were. Any good detective will tell you that Paul's shooting was from someone who was close to him but was extremely angry at Paul. They'll go on to tell you that Maggie's killing was wildly sloppy, and the shooter or shooters were taken by surprise by Maggie. Almost as if they thought Maggie went back to the house on the golf cart with Alex, just like Alex said he did under oath.
Crime and Cask | Alex Murdaugh
For those now intrigued by my assertions and clues, I urge you to go read my new book, Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt, available at Amazon and Barnes & Noble. It's rated 4.6 on Amazon and Goodreads because it was well-investigated, thought-out, and well-written. I use the prosecution's own evidence to prove to my readers that Alex Murdaugh not only did not commit these crimes, but in many cases, science and math prove he could not have even come close to doing it.
Conclusion
The murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh remain a complex and puzzling case. While SLED investigators have made significant progress in their investigation, there are still many unanswered questions. Further investigation is needed to uncover the truth behind these murders and ensure that justice is served in a second trial of Alex Murdaugh.Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt
November 14, 2023
The Alex Murdaugh Saga: A Tale of Timing and Contradictions
The Alex Murdaugh double murder case has captivated the nation with its twists and turns, leaving many questioning the truth behind the tragic events of June 2021. The prosecution's narrative paints a picture of a husband and father driven by financial desperation and a desire to silence his wife and son. However, a closer examination of the timing of the events raises serious questions about the prosecution's theory of the crime.
According to the prosecution, Alex Murdaugh shot his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, at their family's property in South Carolina. They claim that Murdaugh shot Paul twice with a 12-gauge shotgun, then put down the shotgun, picked up a .300 Blackout rifle, and ran 30 feet at an angle to shoot Maggie. This sequence of events is based on the physical evidence found at the crime scene, including shell casings and blood splatter.
However, there is a critical flaw in the prosecution's timeline. Maggie was found dead just 30 feet from the hangar door, where she had been shot. If the prosecution's version of events is correct, it would have taken Murdaugh 12 to 15 seconds to complete the actions described, including putting down one gun, picking up another, running to Maggie, and shooting her.
According to eyewitness testimony, Maggie was able to run out of the hangar and travel 30 feet in just 5 to 6 seconds. This means that she would have reached her final resting spot well before Murdaugh could have gotten to her and shot her.
Additionally, crime scene investigators have testified that Maggie had gun stippling on her body. Gun stippling is caused by small particles of metal and gunpowder being ejected from the gun barrel when it is fired. These particles can only reach a range of about 3 feet, so the presence of gun stippling on Maggie's body indicates that she was shot from a distance of less than 3 feet.
This further contradicts the prosecution's claim that Murdaugh shot Maggie from 30 feet away. If Maggie was shot from within 3 feet, then Murdaugh could not have been the one who shot her.
The discrepancies in the timing of events and the physical evidence raise serious doubts about the prosecution's case against Alex Murdaugh. While the prosecution has presented a narrative that seems plausible, a closer examination reveals inconsistencies and contradictions that cannot be ignored.
The Alex Murdaugh case is a complex and challenging one, and it is important to consider all of the evidence carefully before drawing any conclusions. The prosecution's theory of the crime is based on circumstantial evidence, and the inconsistencies in the timing of events and the physical evidence cast doubt on its reliability.
As the trial continues, it is crucial to remain objective and open-minded. The pursuit of justice requires a thorough and impartial examination of the evidence, and we must be willing to question assumptions and challenge established narratives in order to uncover the truth.Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt
According to the prosecution, Alex Murdaugh shot his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, at their family's property in South Carolina. They claim that Murdaugh shot Paul twice with a 12-gauge shotgun, then put down the shotgun, picked up a .300 Blackout rifle, and ran 30 feet at an angle to shoot Maggie. This sequence of events is based on the physical evidence found at the crime scene, including shell casings and blood splatter.
However, there is a critical flaw in the prosecution's timeline. Maggie was found dead just 30 feet from the hangar door, where she had been shot. If the prosecution's version of events is correct, it would have taken Murdaugh 12 to 15 seconds to complete the actions described, including putting down one gun, picking up another, running to Maggie, and shooting her.
According to eyewitness testimony, Maggie was able to run out of the hangar and travel 30 feet in just 5 to 6 seconds. This means that she would have reached her final resting spot well before Murdaugh could have gotten to her and shot her.
Additionally, crime scene investigators have testified that Maggie had gun stippling on her body. Gun stippling is caused by small particles of metal and gunpowder being ejected from the gun barrel when it is fired. These particles can only reach a range of about 3 feet, so the presence of gun stippling on Maggie's body indicates that she was shot from a distance of less than 3 feet.
This further contradicts the prosecution's claim that Murdaugh shot Maggie from 30 feet away. If Maggie was shot from within 3 feet, then Murdaugh could not have been the one who shot her.
The discrepancies in the timing of events and the physical evidence raise serious doubts about the prosecution's case against Alex Murdaugh. While the prosecution has presented a narrative that seems plausible, a closer examination reveals inconsistencies and contradictions that cannot be ignored.
The Alex Murdaugh case is a complex and challenging one, and it is important to consider all of the evidence carefully before drawing any conclusions. The prosecution's theory of the crime is based on circumstantial evidence, and the inconsistencies in the timing of events and the physical evidence cast doubt on its reliability.
As the trial continues, it is crucial to remain objective and open-minded. The pursuit of justice requires a thorough and impartial examination of the evidence, and we must be willing to question assumptions and challenge established narratives in order to uncover the truth.Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt
November 10, 2023
Excerpt from the Book: DEFENDING ALEX MURDAUGH Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt
I have a lot more questions I would have asked Nathan Tuten on the stand for a lot more detail about that party, when Paul discovered his gun was missing, and how Nathan found out it was missing. Did they ever hear of who stole it, or have suspicions? I would have asked if Nathan owned a .300 Blackout, or did he just use the Murdaugh guns. I would have dug deeper into his experiences at Moselle, when living in the cabin. Tell me about how you get to the kennels from the cabin, are there trails behind the cabin to the kennels, shortcuts that he knew of?
Then I have to ask, why did Jim Griffin try to trip up Nathan on the question of the thermal scope.300 Blackout. The questions start like this, Jim Griffin, ‘whose gun did you think got stolen, Paul’s or Buster’s?’ Nathan seemed taken aback by this question with an abrupt response, “I’d assume Paul’s.”
Nathan’s eyes just after being asked by Jim Griffin, whose gun did you think got stolen, Paul’s or Buster’s? Photo: Colleton County
Jim Griffin, “were you aware that the .300 Blackout replacement, did not have a thermal scope?’ Nathan, “if I didn’t know about the gun, then no!” Griffin, “so, you know whether or not this is Buster’s .300 Blackout sitting here in the courtroom?” Tuten angrily quipped back, “that is the gun that I used at Moselle.”
Griffin stops with this line of questioning, mistakenly in my opinion. But the fun doesn’t stop there. I want you to look at the prosecutor’s body language while the first questions started coming in. Then their body language after the questioning starts to get tight, and Tuten gets upset at the question of knowing about the tan .300 Blackout. They went from bored, to concerned and perked up in a matter of seconds. My opinion on this is that something is up with these questions, and Nathan does not like this line of questioning.
Think of it this way. Nathan testified that he and Paul were best friends and talked almost daily by phone. We also know Will Loving, another close friend of Paul and Buster and the Murdaughs, and the Tuten’s and the Gibson’s, and so on. But Paul gets another replacement .300 Blackout in April 2021, and Will Loving and Paul sighted it in near the main house at Moselle, and the first time Nathan had ever heard of Paul even getting another .300 Blackout was at the trial?
CHAPTER 17
Tinsley the Tiger, Blanca the Housekeeper, and Nathan Tuten
Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt
Then I have to ask, why did Jim Griffin try to trip up Nathan on the question of the thermal scope.300 Blackout. The questions start like this, Jim Griffin, ‘whose gun did you think got stolen, Paul’s or Buster’s?’ Nathan seemed taken aback by this question with an abrupt response, “I’d assume Paul’s.”
Nathan’s eyes just after being asked by Jim Griffin, whose gun did you think got stolen, Paul’s or Buster’s? Photo: Colleton County
Jim Griffin, “were you aware that the .300 Blackout replacement, did not have a thermal scope?’ Nathan, “if I didn’t know about the gun, then no!” Griffin, “so, you know whether or not this is Buster’s .300 Blackout sitting here in the courtroom?” Tuten angrily quipped back, “that is the gun that I used at Moselle.”
Griffin stops with this line of questioning, mistakenly in my opinion. But the fun doesn’t stop there. I want you to look at the prosecutor’s body language while the first questions started coming in. Then their body language after the questioning starts to get tight, and Tuten gets upset at the question of knowing about the tan .300 Blackout. They went from bored, to concerned and perked up in a matter of seconds. My opinion on this is that something is up with these questions, and Nathan does not like this line of questioning.
Think of it this way. Nathan testified that he and Paul were best friends and talked almost daily by phone. We also know Will Loving, another close friend of Paul and Buster and the Murdaughs, and the Tuten’s and the Gibson’s, and so on. But Paul gets another replacement .300 Blackout in April 2021, and Will Loving and Paul sighted it in near the main house at Moselle, and the first time Nathan had ever heard of Paul even getting another .300 Blackout was at the trial?
CHAPTER 17
Tinsley the Tiger, Blanca the Housekeeper, and Nathan Tuten
Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt
November 9, 2023
Crime and Cask's 'Defending Alex Murdaugh' is a Must-Read for True Crime Fans
Crime and Cask's 'Defending Alex Murdaugh' is a Must-Read for True Crime Fans
Crime and Cask's new book, Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt, is a must-read for true crime fans and anyone interested in the case of Alex Murdaugh, the disgraced South Carolina attorney accused of murdering his wife and son.
The book takes a deep dive into the case, examining the evidence, interviewing witnesses, and presenting a compelling defense for Murdaugh. Crime and Cask argue that the prosecution's case is flawed and that Murdaugh is not guilty of the murders.
In addition to its legal analysis, the book also provides a fascinating look into the world of Alex Murdaugh and the South Carolina Lowcountry. Crime and Cask paint a picture of a man who was once at the top of his world, but whose life spiraled out of control after the murders of his wife and son.
The book is well-written and engaging, and it does a great job of explaining the complex legal issues involved in the case. It is also a must-read for anyone who wants to understand the motivations behind Murdaugh's alleged crimes.
Why the book is #1 in New Releases in Criminal Law Evidence on Amazon
There are a few reasons why Crime and Cask's Defending Alex Murdaugh is #1 in New Releases in Criminal Law Evidence on Amazon.
First, the case of Alex Murdaugh has been one of the most high-profile criminal cases in the country over the past year. It has been covered extensively by the media, and it has captured the attention of the public.
Second, the book is written by Crime and Cask, a popular true crime podcast. Crime and Cask have a large and engaged following, and their fans are eager to read their take on the Murdaugh case.
Third, the book is well-written and informative. Crime and Cask do a great job of explaining the complex legal issues involved in the case, and they present a compelling defense for Murdaugh.
Overall, Crime and Cask's Defending Alex Murdaugh is a must-read for anyone interested in the case of Alex Murdaugh or in true crime in general. It is a well-written and informative book that provides a unique perspective on one of the most high-profile criminal cases in the country.
Crime and Cask's new book, Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt, is a must-read for true crime fans and anyone interested in the case of Alex Murdaugh, the disgraced South Carolina attorney accused of murdering his wife and son.
The book takes a deep dive into the case, examining the evidence, interviewing witnesses, and presenting a compelling defense for Murdaugh. Crime and Cask argue that the prosecution's case is flawed and that Murdaugh is not guilty of the murders.
In addition to its legal analysis, the book also provides a fascinating look into the world of Alex Murdaugh and the South Carolina Lowcountry. Crime and Cask paint a picture of a man who was once at the top of his world, but whose life spiraled out of control after the murders of his wife and son.
The book is well-written and engaging, and it does a great job of explaining the complex legal issues involved in the case. It is also a must-read for anyone who wants to understand the motivations behind Murdaugh's alleged crimes.
Why the book is #1 in New Releases in Criminal Law Evidence on Amazon
There are a few reasons why Crime and Cask's Defending Alex Murdaugh is #1 in New Releases in Criminal Law Evidence on Amazon.
First, the case of Alex Murdaugh has been one of the most high-profile criminal cases in the country over the past year. It has been covered extensively by the media, and it has captured the attention of the public.
Second, the book is written by Crime and Cask, a popular true crime podcast. Crime and Cask have a large and engaged following, and their fans are eager to read their take on the Murdaugh case.
Third, the book is well-written and informative. Crime and Cask do a great job of explaining the complex legal issues involved in the case, and they present a compelling defense for Murdaugh.
Overall, Crime and Cask's Defending Alex Murdaugh is a must-read for anyone interested in the case of Alex Murdaugh or in true crime in general. It is a well-written and informative book that provides a unique perspective on one of the most high-profile criminal cases in the country.
November 3, 2023
Meet Crime and Cask
Join us for a special book signing event with Crime and Cask at Hillman Beer in Morganton, NC on Wednesday, November 15th, 2023 from 6-8pm! Crime and Cask is a popular true crime author that was the #1 new release book on Amazon for 3 weeks in Legal Thrillers and is the #8 book in White Collar Crimes on Amazon.
At the book signing, Crime and Cask will be selling and signing copies of his new book, Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt
Books will be available for sale for $39.99, and each copy will be signed and autographed by the hosts.
This event will also be aired live on TikTok to their 42,000 fans, so even if you can't make it to Morganton in person, you can still be a part of the fun!
To learn more about Hillman Beer, visit their website at https://hillmanbeer.com/morganton-tap....
Why you should attend
Meet the hosts of your favorite true crime book, Defending Alex Murdaugh
Get your copy of their new book signed and autographed
Support a local brewery
Be a part of the live TikTok broadcast
Don't miss out on this unique opportunity to meet the hosts of Crime and Cask and get your copy of their new book signed! Mark your calendars for Wednesday, November 8th, 2023 from 7-9pm at Hillman Beer in Morganton, NC.
At the book signing, Crime and Cask will be selling and signing copies of his new book, Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt
Books will be available for sale for $39.99, and each copy will be signed and autographed by the hosts.
This event will also be aired live on TikTok to their 42,000 fans, so even if you can't make it to Morganton in person, you can still be a part of the fun!
To learn more about Hillman Beer, visit their website at https://hillmanbeer.com/morganton-tap....
Why you should attend
Meet the hosts of your favorite true crime book, Defending Alex Murdaugh
Get your copy of their new book signed and autographed
Support a local brewery
Be a part of the live TikTok broadcast
Don't miss out on this unique opportunity to meet the hosts of Crime and Cask and get your copy of their new book signed! Mark your calendars for Wednesday, November 8th, 2023 from 7-9pm at Hillman Beer in Morganton, NC.
October 29, 2023
Crime and Cask's Extensive Experiments
Crime and Cask conducts extensive experiments at Moselle for book defending Alex Murdaugh
Crime and Cask, the author of the bestselling book Defending Alex Murdaugh, Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt, has conducted extensive experiments at the Moselle property in South Carolina to test his theories about the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh.
Cask has been a vocal critic of the prosecution's case against Murdaugh, and his book presents a number of alternative theories about the murders. In order to test these theories, Crime and Cask conducted a variety of experiments at Moselle, including:
Testing the amount of time it would take to travel between the different locations on the property where the bodies were found.
Testing the times it takes to drive from various entrances and tie it back to the SLED timeline.
Cask also found that it would take more than 10 to 15 seconds to travel between the feed room to where Maggie's body was found. This suggests that the killer had to be stationed and not move like the prosecution says Alex did, as Maggie made it to her final resting spot in under 6 seconds.
Cask's experiments have been praised by some for their rigor and attention to detail. However, others have criticized his methods, arguing that his experiments are not conclusive.
Regardless of the criticism, Cask's experiments have generated a lot of discussion and debate about the Murdaugh murders.
Conclusion:
Crime and Cask's experiments at Moselle are an important contribution to the Murdaugh murder case. His work has raised serious questions about the prosecution's case and has provided new insights into the crime scene. It will be interesting to see how Cask's experiments are used in the defense of Alex Murdaugh in trial number two.
Crime and Cask, the author of the bestselling book Defending Alex Murdaugh, Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt, has conducted extensive experiments at the Moselle property in South Carolina to test his theories about the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh.
Cask has been a vocal critic of the prosecution's case against Murdaugh, and his book presents a number of alternative theories about the murders. In order to test these theories, Crime and Cask conducted a variety of experiments at Moselle, including:
Testing the amount of time it would take to travel between the different locations on the property where the bodies were found.
Testing the times it takes to drive from various entrances and tie it back to the SLED timeline.
Cask also found that it would take more than 10 to 15 seconds to travel between the feed room to where Maggie's body was found. This suggests that the killer had to be stationed and not move like the prosecution says Alex did, as Maggie made it to her final resting spot in under 6 seconds.
Cask's experiments have been praised by some for their rigor and attention to detail. However, others have criticized his methods, arguing that his experiments are not conclusive.
Regardless of the criticism, Cask's experiments have generated a lot of discussion and debate about the Murdaugh murders.
Conclusion:
Crime and Cask's experiments at Moselle are an important contribution to the Murdaugh murder case. His work has raised serious questions about the prosecution's case and has provided new insights into the crime scene. It will be interesting to see how Cask's experiments are used in the defense of Alex Murdaugh in trial number two.
October 27, 2023
Crime and Cask: The Bestselling True Crime Author
Crime and Cask is the #1 bestselling true crime author on Amazon, and his books are soon to be published by Barnes & Noble. He is known for his compelling writing style and his ability to get to the heart of the most complex cases.
Cask's first book, Defending Alex Murdaugh, Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt, was a critical and commercial success. In the book, Cask takes a deep dive into the evidence against Murdaugh, and raises serious doubts about his guilt in the murders of his wife and son.
Cask's second book, The Murder of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh: A True Crime Investigation, is set to be released in early 2024. In the book, Cask presents new evidence and theories in the case, and he challenges the official narrative.
Cask is a rising star in the true crime genre, and his books are eagerly awaited by fans. He is known for his unbiased approach to his work, and his commitment to finding the truth.
Here is a short story about Crime and Cask:
Crime and Cask sat at his desk, staring at the blank computer screen. He was supposed to be working on his next book, but he was struggling to focus. His mind kept wandering back to the case of Alex Murdaugh.
Cask had been following the case closely since the beginning, and he had serious doubts about Murdaugh's guilt. He had read all of the evidence, and he had heard all interviews of many of the key players and completed many experiments out at Moselle. He was convinced that there was more to the story than what the prosecution was letting on.
Cask took a deep breath and started to type. He poured his thoughts and frustrations onto the page. He wrote about the inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, and the possible alternative suspects. He wrote about the Murdaugh family's secrets, and the power they wielded in South Carolina.
Cask wrote for hours, until his fingers were sore and his eyes were burning. When he was finished, he read over his work and smiled. He knew that he had something special.
Cask's book was a bestseller. It was praised by critics and readers alike for its unbiased approach and its compelling writing style. Cask had become one of the most respected true crime authors in the world.
But Cask wasn't satisfied. He knew that there was still more to the Murdaugh case to be discovered. He was determined to find the truth, no matter what it took.
I would like to take this opportunity to pay tribute to the hardworking women who helped in the writing of this book. They didn't hold back, and together we worked to its completion.
These women are some of the most intelligent, dedicated, and passionate people I know. They gave their time and energy to this project without hesitation, and they never gave up, even when things were tough.
I am so grateful for their contributions. Without them, this book would not have been possible.
Here are just a few of the ways in which these women helped to make this book a reality:
They researched and compiled the facts of the case. They went through the interviews of key witnesses and experts. They helped me to develop my ideas and to organize my thoughts.
They edited and proofread the manuscript.
They provided me with support and encouragement throughout the process.
I am truly indebted to these women for their help and support. This book is a testament to their hard work and dedication.
I would also like to thank all of the other women who have supported me in my writing career. I am so grateful for the female community of authors and readers. You are all an inspiration to me.
To all the hardworking women out there: thank you for everything. You are the backbone of our society.
Cask's first book, Defending Alex Murdaugh, Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt, was a critical and commercial success. In the book, Cask takes a deep dive into the evidence against Murdaugh, and raises serious doubts about his guilt in the murders of his wife and son.
Cask's second book, The Murder of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh: A True Crime Investigation, is set to be released in early 2024. In the book, Cask presents new evidence and theories in the case, and he challenges the official narrative.
Cask is a rising star in the true crime genre, and his books are eagerly awaited by fans. He is known for his unbiased approach to his work, and his commitment to finding the truth.
Here is a short story about Crime and Cask:
Crime and Cask sat at his desk, staring at the blank computer screen. He was supposed to be working on his next book, but he was struggling to focus. His mind kept wandering back to the case of Alex Murdaugh.
Cask had been following the case closely since the beginning, and he had serious doubts about Murdaugh's guilt. He had read all of the evidence, and he had heard all interviews of many of the key players and completed many experiments out at Moselle. He was convinced that there was more to the story than what the prosecution was letting on.
Cask took a deep breath and started to type. He poured his thoughts and frustrations onto the page. He wrote about the inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, and the possible alternative suspects. He wrote about the Murdaugh family's secrets, and the power they wielded in South Carolina.
Cask wrote for hours, until his fingers were sore and his eyes were burning. When he was finished, he read over his work and smiled. He knew that he had something special.
Cask's book was a bestseller. It was praised by critics and readers alike for its unbiased approach and its compelling writing style. Cask had become one of the most respected true crime authors in the world.
But Cask wasn't satisfied. He knew that there was still more to the Murdaugh case to be discovered. He was determined to find the truth, no matter what it took.
I would like to take this opportunity to pay tribute to the hardworking women who helped in the writing of this book. They didn't hold back, and together we worked to its completion.
These women are some of the most intelligent, dedicated, and passionate people I know. They gave their time and energy to this project without hesitation, and they never gave up, even when things were tough.
I am so grateful for their contributions. Without them, this book would not have been possible.
Here are just a few of the ways in which these women helped to make this book a reality:
They researched and compiled the facts of the case. They went through the interviews of key witnesses and experts. They helped me to develop my ideas and to organize my thoughts.
They edited and proofread the manuscript.
They provided me with support and encouragement throughout the process.
I am truly indebted to these women for their help and support. This book is a testament to their hard work and dedication.
I would also like to thank all of the other women who have supported me in my writing career. I am so grateful for the female community of authors and readers. You are all an inspiration to me.
To all the hardworking women out there: thank you for everything. You are the backbone of our society.
October 25, 2023
Crime and Cask: A Legal Thriller Sensation Takes the Top Spot on Amazon
Introduction:
In the realm of legal thrillers, a new star is shining brightly, and that star is none other than Crime and Cask. With the release of the riveting book, "Defending Alex Murdaugh, Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt," Crime and Cask has captured the #1 position on Amazon's Legal Thrillers chart, a position usually reserved for legends like John Grisham. But the story doesn't end there; this page-turner has also climbed to the #4 spot in Amazon's White Collar Crime category. Crime and Cask's success is undeniable, and it's about time that the publishing giants took notice.
A Thriller Unmatched:
"Defending Alex Murdaugh, Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt" is not just a legal thriller; it's a rollercoaster of legal intrigue, suspense, and unexpected twists. Crime and Cask, known for creating gripping courtroom dramas, delivers a narrative that keeps readers glued to the pages, craving for more.
The #1 Spot:
Securing the top spot on Amazon's Legal Thrillers chart is a significant accomplishment, especially in a genre as competitive as this one. It signifies that Crime and Cask's storytelling talent is on par with the best in the business. Readers who yearn for legal suspense, courtroom drama, and thought-provoking narratives have found a new favorite author in Crime and Cask.
Challenging the Giants:
Crime and Cask's ascent to the #1 position is not just a personal triumph but also a challenge to the established giants of the legal thriller genre, including John Grisham. It's a call to all readers and publishers to recognize the arrival of a fresh and formidable voice in the genre. Crime and Cask's success is a testament to the author's dedication to delivering unique, unforgettable legal stories.
Unveiling New Theories:
What sets "Defending Alex Murdaugh" apart is its audacious exploration of groundbreaking theories regarding Alex Murdaugh's innocence. Crime and Cask, much like a detective, unveils fresh perspectives and opinions that have remained hidden in the case. Readers are in for an intellectual adventure that challenges conventional beliefs and expectations.
A Call to the Publishers:
As "Defending Alex Murdaugh" continues to make waves and climb the charts, the publishing industry should take note. The success of this book demonstrates Crime and Cask's ability to capture the imagination of readers and create unforgettable narratives. With such compelling storytelling, it's high time a prestigious publishing house like Doubleday or another major player signs Crime and Cask to a book deal. This author's voice deserves a wider audience, and the world is eagerly waiting for the next legal masterpiece.
Conclusion:
Crime and Cask's incredible journey to the #1 spot on Amazon's Legal Thrillers chart is a remarkable feat in the world of legal fiction. "Defending Alex Murdaugh, Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt" is not just a book; it's a gripping journey through the complexities of the legal system. As this sensational success story continues, it's a clear message to the publishing industry to recognize and embrace this emerging literary powerhouse. Crime and Cask's name is one that's destined to become synonymous with the best in legal thrillers, and it's time to welcome this extraordinary talent with open arms.
In the realm of legal thrillers, a new star is shining brightly, and that star is none other than Crime and Cask. With the release of the riveting book, "Defending Alex Murdaugh, Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt," Crime and Cask has captured the #1 position on Amazon's Legal Thrillers chart, a position usually reserved for legends like John Grisham. But the story doesn't end there; this page-turner has also climbed to the #4 spot in Amazon's White Collar Crime category. Crime and Cask's success is undeniable, and it's about time that the publishing giants took notice.
A Thriller Unmatched:
"Defending Alex Murdaugh, Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt" is not just a legal thriller; it's a rollercoaster of legal intrigue, suspense, and unexpected twists. Crime and Cask, known for creating gripping courtroom dramas, delivers a narrative that keeps readers glued to the pages, craving for more.
The #1 Spot:
Securing the top spot on Amazon's Legal Thrillers chart is a significant accomplishment, especially in a genre as competitive as this one. It signifies that Crime and Cask's storytelling talent is on par with the best in the business. Readers who yearn for legal suspense, courtroom drama, and thought-provoking narratives have found a new favorite author in Crime and Cask.
Challenging the Giants:
Crime and Cask's ascent to the #1 position is not just a personal triumph but also a challenge to the established giants of the legal thriller genre, including John Grisham. It's a call to all readers and publishers to recognize the arrival of a fresh and formidable voice in the genre. Crime and Cask's success is a testament to the author's dedication to delivering unique, unforgettable legal stories.
Unveiling New Theories:
What sets "Defending Alex Murdaugh" apart is its audacious exploration of groundbreaking theories regarding Alex Murdaugh's innocence. Crime and Cask, much like a detective, unveils fresh perspectives and opinions that have remained hidden in the case. Readers are in for an intellectual adventure that challenges conventional beliefs and expectations.
A Call to the Publishers:
As "Defending Alex Murdaugh" continues to make waves and climb the charts, the publishing industry should take note. The success of this book demonstrates Crime and Cask's ability to capture the imagination of readers and create unforgettable narratives. With such compelling storytelling, it's high time a prestigious publishing house like Doubleday or another major player signs Crime and Cask to a book deal. This author's voice deserves a wider audience, and the world is eagerly waiting for the next legal masterpiece.
Conclusion:
Crime and Cask's incredible journey to the #1 spot on Amazon's Legal Thrillers chart is a remarkable feat in the world of legal fiction. "Defending Alex Murdaugh, Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt" is not just a book; it's a gripping journey through the complexities of the legal system. As this sensational success story continues, it's a clear message to the publishing industry to recognize and embrace this emerging literary powerhouse. Crime and Cask's name is one that's destined to become synonymous with the best in legal thrillers, and it's time to welcome this extraordinary talent with open arms.
Crime and Cask Climbs the Charts
Crime and Cask's new book, Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt, has debuted at #1 on Amazon in the Legal Thrillers category. This is a remarkable achievement, given that Crime and Cask is a self-published author and that the book is competing against books by established authors like John Grisham.
The book's success is a testament to Crime and Cask's writing skills and to the public's interest in the Alex Murdaugh case. Crime and Cask is a master of the legal thriller genre, and he has crafted a book that is both gripping and informative. He presents the case from all sides and raises important questions about justice and the pursuit of truth.
In addition to its success in the Legal Thrillers category, Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt has also moved up three spots in Amazon's White Collar Crime category to the #4 spot. This suggests that the book is appealing to a wide range of readers, including those who are interested in true crime, business, and law.
Crime and Cask's success is a reminder that self-published authors can achieve success in even the most competitive categories. It is also a reminder that readers are looking for fresh and thought-provoking voices in the legal thriller genre.
Here are some of the reasons why Crime and Cask's new book has been so successful:
The book is well-written and engaging. Crime and Cask is a skilled storyteller, and he has crafted a book that will keep readers on the edge of their seats.
Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt
The book is informative. Crime and Cask presents the case in a clear and concise way, and he does a good job of explaining the complex legal concepts involved.
The book is timely. The Alex Murdaugh case is one of the most high-profile murder trials of recent years, and the public is eager to learn more about it.
The book is different. Crime and Cask presents a fresh and thought-provoking perspective on the case. He challenges conventional wisdom and raises important questions about justice and the pursuit of truth.
If you are a fan of legal thrillers, true crime, or the law, be sure to check out Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt by Crime and Cask. It is a book that will stay with you long after you finish reading it.
The book's success is a testament to Crime and Cask's writing skills and to the public's interest in the Alex Murdaugh case. Crime and Cask is a master of the legal thriller genre, and he has crafted a book that is both gripping and informative. He presents the case from all sides and raises important questions about justice and the pursuit of truth.
In addition to its success in the Legal Thrillers category, Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt has also moved up three spots in Amazon's White Collar Crime category to the #4 spot. This suggests that the book is appealing to a wide range of readers, including those who are interested in true crime, business, and law.
Crime and Cask's success is a reminder that self-published authors can achieve success in even the most competitive categories. It is also a reminder that readers are looking for fresh and thought-provoking voices in the legal thriller genre.
Here are some of the reasons why Crime and Cask's new book has been so successful:
The book is well-written and engaging. Crime and Cask is a skilled storyteller, and he has crafted a book that will keep readers on the edge of their seats.
Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt
The book is informative. Crime and Cask presents the case in a clear and concise way, and he does a good job of explaining the complex legal concepts involved.
The book is timely. The Alex Murdaugh case is one of the most high-profile murder trials of recent years, and the public is eager to learn more about it.
The book is different. Crime and Cask presents a fresh and thought-provoking perspective on the case. He challenges conventional wisdom and raises important questions about justice and the pursuit of truth.
If you are a fan of legal thrillers, true crime, or the law, be sure to check out Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt by Crime and Cask. It is a book that will stay with you long after you finish reading it.
