Discover new books on Goodreads
See if your friends have read any of Ray Gregory's books
Ray’s 2024 Year in Books
Take a look at Ray’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
Ray Gregory’s Followers (3)



Ray Gregory
Goodreads Author
Member Since
September 2024
|
Dark Treats: 17 Short Stories
4.23 avg rating — 31 ratings
—
2 editions
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
Curves and Twists: A Dozen Short Stories
4.47 avg rating — 19 ratings
—
3 editions
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
* Note: these are all the books on Goodreads for this author. To add more, click here.
Ray’s Recent Updates
|
Ray Gregory
rated a book it was ok
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
An American Christian Nationalist Dream Scenario The Fractured Union (by James W. Parker) is another screed about politics and religion posing as a near-future novel, which includes a hefty batch of historical backstory. Anyone who has read this autho An American Christian Nationalist Dream Scenario The Fractured Union (by James W. Parker) is another screed about politics and religion posing as a near-future novel, which includes a hefty batch of historical backstory. Anyone who has read this author’s previous book Break Up of America (published in 2021) will get a strong sense of déjà vu from reading this iteration, because all the same points regarding what is wrong with America, plus the longed-for dissolution of the United States of America, were spelled out there too. While its prolific author is capable of writing well and telling a good, if longwinded, yarn, his perspective is permeated by religious conviction and especially religious grievances, most notably the notion that the U.S. government has infringed on Christians’ right to practice their religion. We are told the fanciful (and oxymoronic) tale that while the Founding Fathers wanted to keep government out of religion, they did not want to keep religion out of government. For example, “The majority of the delegates [to the Constitutional Convention] were firm in their belief that the nation should be grounded in a moral law derived from biblical teachings” — yet the U. S. Constitution that the majority of these delegates voted into existence, this blueprint the author alleges to be for a government based on the Bible, does not contain even one mention of the Bible, God, Christ, the Ten Commandments, Christianity, etc. Again, the author writes, “But the foundational principles were set in stone, woven into the fabric of the nation: that the Lord is the ultimate judge, lawgiver, and King; that governance should reflect divine order; and that the rights of the people should be guarded through the careful separation of powers. The Founding Fathers, whether conscious of it or not, had created a system that echoed the divine wisdom found in the Bible, ensuring that justice, liberty, and faith would forever guide the nation.” The Bible-thumping portrait that is painted of James Madison, especially regarding his contribution to the Constitution’s First Amendment (which insured the free exercise of religion as well as other rights), is bizarre, since while Madison often used biblical references, he was a strong advocate for individual conscience, religious freedom, and keeping the government separate from religion. Even Benjamin Franklin, who at the time of the Constitutional Convention was an advocate of deism and who questioned traditional Christian doctrines, is alleged by the author to have yearned for a government based on “the scriptures themselves.” But in truth Franklin, as were most of the rest of the Founding Fathers, were secularist sons of the Enlightenment who sought to save America from religious tyranny (including religious wars and religious persecution) as much as from political tyranny. The deistic God they paid lip service to was more of a philosophical construct than anything approaching a facsimile of the Christian deity. And indeed they chose symbols from Free Masonry and classical antiquity instead of from the Bible to decorate the national currency, government seals, government buildings, etc. A small point, howbeit a picturesque example of the book’s questionable historicity, is its assertion that “the grand marble pillars of the Supreme Court building were a fitting backdrop” when the Supreme Court of John Marshall decided (in the early 1800s) that the First Amendment prohibits the establishment of a national religion. Yet the Supreme Court building was not built until 1935. Before then the Court met in borrowed buildings in New York City and Philadelphia and later in the Capitol building in DC. It is claimed that successive Supreme Court decisions got the meaning of Jefferson’s “wall of separation” between church and state wrong. This is a common grievance of modern-day rightwing Christian nationalists who would like to impose the trappings of their religion on all manner of American life, private and public — and to hell with (pun intended) believers of other religions and non-believers in any religion. As if being able to publicly pray in any of the 350,000-400,000 churches that dot the American landscape isn’t enough for them, these authoritarian Christians particularly want to subject every American school kid, whatever his or her religious affiliation or lack thereof, to public prayers — even though Jesus himself told his followers that they should pray in private and not make a show of public prayer as the hypocritical Pharisees did. In the blink of an eye, the narrative jets past the wall-of-separation chip on Christian nationalists’ shoulders to their other gargantuan bugaboo, the “liberals,” the very banes of their existence. Did you know, for example, that Adolph Hitler was “a product of the liberal ideology”? That by the 1950s, Britain, France, and the United States “had become the strongholds of liberalism” and “had convinced the masses that their oppressive measures — censorship, surveillance, militarization — were for the greater good”? And here most of us were thinking it was the world’s dictatorships, rightwing and leftwing — and not its democracies — who were the really bad guys. A rant against the U.S. government's regulations and its imagined takeover of everything comes next as the story takes us into the lives of near-future everyday American rebels chaffing against the system run by those dastardly liberals, who are as clueless about making government work as they are about religion, and who are “demonizing anyone who disagrees with them” — and wow, how much like a revealing and hypocritical Freudian slip the word “demonizing” sounds here, with all its religious overtones. And even more so when one considers the present-day non-fictional reality of overtly Christian nationalist MAGA/Trumpism ruling the nation and cramming Project 2025 down all those liberals’ throats. But every perennial rightwing trope is trotted out, from states’ rights to secession to deporting all “illegals” to even returning the nation to the gold standard. One of the righteous rightwing rebels even accuses the story’s fictional liberal president of the United States of “threatening to pull state funding, override our laws, and use federal agencies as a political weapon.” WOW again, in this time of Trump. And what are the answers to the imagined liberal nightmare? For starters, a somewhat cuddlier, more inclusive “Confederacy 2.0” — what one of the book’s characters actually calls it —though now known as the Conservative States of America, which will usher in a new Golden Age based on “Gold. Coal. Oil. Industry. And God.” And a few more new nations are carved out of the old U. S. of A. too: the New Republic of Texas, the Mormon Nation, the Republic of Alaska (gotta wonder how long Vladimir Putin would let that go ungrabbed), the Hawaiian Nation (which would make an excellent fueling station for the Chinese navy), Southern California (now a territory of Mexico again), and what is left of the U.S. now renaming itself (what else?) the United Socialist States of America, which. of course, is doomed to failure because it’s still being run by all those feckless liberal devils. The bottom line is, if this kind of rightwing Christian nationalist fever dream, the end of the United States of America, is what floats your boat, and you don’t mind wading through the ton of numbing political machinations that make it possible, then this book may give you a few hours of rousing, howbeit delusional, validation. ...more |
|
|
Ray Gregory
has read
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
A Good Story Hook, But… An Innocent Heart: A Supernatural Mystery Thriller (by Vikki Mount, an Australian author) has an interesting plot and pretty good characterizations, but much of the third-person, omniscient viewpoint writing has the antiseptic A Good Story Hook, But… An Innocent Heart: A Supernatural Mystery Thriller (by Vikki Mount, an Australian author) has an interesting plot and pretty good characterizations, but much of the third-person, omniscient viewpoint writing has the antiseptic feel of reading journalism. Things also veer into implausibility at times, though not the supernatural content as much as the sometimes stereotypical and uniformed take on things American, particularly American conversational dialogue and American police procedures. But these are hardly game changers. There’s even some extra fun (for American readers, anyway) in spotting such glitches in the story’s Americana. The plot deals with a phenomenon known as cellular memory, which may or may not have a foothold in reality, but it makes for an interesting story hook. All in all, a fun yarn, if perhaps a bit too long and a bit naïve in its telling. ...more |
|
|
Sep 23, 2025 12:29PM
· like
· see review ·
preview book
See a Problem?
We’d love your help.
Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of
An Innocent Heart by Vikki Mount.
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Not the book you’re looking for?
Preview — An Innocent Heart by Vikki Mount |
|
|
"A Raw and Riveting Exploration of Love
'Devious Love: Six Stories' is an unforgettable collection that immediately grabs you and doesn't let go until the very last page. True to his raw approach toward universal themes, Ray Gregory delivers yet anothe" Read more of this review » |
|
|
Sep 02, 2025 10:33AM
· see review ·
preview book
See a Problem?
We’d love your help.
Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of
Devious Love by Ray Gregory.
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Not the book you’re looking for?
Preview — Devious Love by Ray Gregory |
|
|
Ray Gregory
rated a book it was ok
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
An American Christian Nationalist Dream Scenario The Fractured Union (by James W. Parker) is another screed about politics and religion posing as a near-future novel, which includes a hefty batch of historical backstory. Anyone who has read this autho An American Christian Nationalist Dream Scenario The Fractured Union (by James W. Parker) is another screed about politics and religion posing as a near-future novel, which includes a hefty batch of historical backstory. Anyone who has read this author’s previous book Break Up of America (published in 2021) will get a strong sense of déjà vu from reading this iteration, because all the same points regarding what is wrong with America, plus the longed-for dissolution of the United States of America, were spelled out there too. While its prolific author is capable of writing well and telling a good, if longwinded, yarn, his perspective is permeated by religious conviction and especially religious grievances, most notably the notion that the U.S. government has infringed on Christians’ right to practice their religion. We are told the fanciful (and oxymoronic) tale that while the Founding Fathers wanted to keep government out of religion, they did not want to keep religion out of government. For example, “The majority of the delegates [to the Constitutional Convention] were firm in their belief that the nation should be grounded in a moral law derived from biblical teachings” — yet the U. S. Constitution that the majority of these delegates voted into existence, this blueprint the author alleges to be for a government based on the Bible, does not contain even one mention of the Bible, God, Christ, the Ten Commandments, Christianity, etc. Again, the author writes, “But the foundational principles were set in stone, woven into the fabric of the nation: that the Lord is the ultimate judge, lawgiver, and King; that governance should reflect divine order; and that the rights of the people should be guarded through the careful separation of powers. The Founding Fathers, whether conscious of it or not, had created a system that echoed the divine wisdom found in the Bible, ensuring that justice, liberty, and faith would forever guide the nation.” The Bible-thumping portrait that is painted of James Madison, especially regarding his contribution to the Constitution’s First Amendment (which insured the free exercise of religion as well as other rights), is bizarre, since while Madison often used biblical references, he was a strong advocate for individual conscience, religious freedom, and keeping the government separate from religion. Even Benjamin Franklin, who at the time of the Constitutional Convention was an advocate of deism and who questioned traditional Christian doctrines, is alleged by the author to have yearned for a government based on “the scriptures themselves.” But in truth Franklin, as were most of the rest of the Founding Fathers, were secularist sons of the Enlightenment who sought to save America from religious tyranny (including religious wars and religious persecution) as much as from political tyranny. The deistic God they paid lip service to was more of a philosophical construct than anything approaching a facsimile of the Christian deity. And indeed they chose symbols from Free Masonry and classical antiquity instead of from the Bible to decorate the national currency, government seals, government buildings, etc. A small point, howbeit a picturesque example of the book’s questionable historicity, is its assertion that “the grand marble pillars of the Supreme Court building were a fitting backdrop” when the Supreme Court of John Marshall decided (in the early 1800s) that the First Amendment prohibits the establishment of a national religion. Yet the Supreme Court building was not built until 1935. Before then the Court met in borrowed buildings in New York City and Philadelphia and later in the Capitol building in DC. It is claimed that successive Supreme Court decisions got the meaning of Jefferson’s “wall of separation” between church and state wrong. This is a common grievance of modern-day rightwing Christian nationalists who would like to impose the trappings of their religion on all manner of American life, private and public — and to hell with (pun intended) believers of other religions and non-believers in any religion. As if being able to publicly pray in any of the 350,000-400,000 churches that dot the American landscape isn’t enough for them, these authoritarian Christians particularly want to subject every American school kid, whatever his or her religious affiliation or lack thereof, to public prayers — even though Jesus himself told his followers that they should pray in private and not make a show of public prayer as the hypocritical Pharisees did. In the blink of an eye, the narrative jets past the wall-of-separation chip on Christian nationalists’ shoulders to their other gargantuan bugaboo, the “liberals,” the very banes of their existence. Did you know, for example, that Adolph Hitler was “a product of the liberal ideology”? That by the 1950s, Britain, France, and the United States “had become the strongholds of liberalism” and “had convinced the masses that their oppressive measures — censorship, surveillance, militarization — were for the greater good”? And here most of us were thinking it was the world’s dictatorships, rightwing and leftwing — and not its democracies — who were the really bad guys. A rant against the U.S. government's regulations and its imagined takeover of everything comes next as the story takes us into the lives of near-future everyday American rebels chaffing against the system run by those dastardly liberals, who are as clueless about making government work as they are about religion, and who are “demonizing anyone who disagrees with them” — and wow, how much like a revealing and hypocritical Freudian slip the word “demonizing” sounds here, with all its religious overtones. And even more so when one considers the present-day non-fictional reality of overtly Christian nationalist MAGA/Trumpism ruling the nation and cramming Project 2025 down all those liberals’ throats. But every perennial rightwing trope is trotted out, from states’ rights to secession to deporting all “illegals” to even returning the nation to the gold standard. One of the righteous rightwing rebels even accuses the story’s fictional liberal president of the United States of “threatening to pull state funding, override our laws, and use federal agencies as a political weapon.” WOW again, in this time of Trump. And what are the answers to the imagined liberal nightmare? For starters, a somewhat cuddlier, more inclusive “Confederacy 2.0” — what one of the book’s characters actually calls it —though now known as the Conservative States of America, which will usher in a new Golden Age based on “Gold. Coal. Oil. Industry. And God.” And a few more new nations are carved out of the old U. S. of A. too: the New Republic of Texas, the Mormon Nation, the Republic of Alaska (gotta wonder how long Vladimir Putin would let that go ungrabbed), the Hawaiian Nation (which would make an excellent fueling station for the Chinese navy), Southern California (now a territory of Mexico again), and what is left of the U.S. now renaming itself (what else?) the United Socialist States of America, which. of course, is doomed to failure because it’s still being run by all those feckless liberal devils. The bottom line is, if this kind of rightwing Christian nationalist fever dream, the end of the United States of America, is what floats your boat, and you don’t mind wading through the ton of numbing political machinations that make it possible, then this book may give you a few hours of rousing, howbeit delusional, validation. ...more |
|
|
Ray Gregory
rated a book it was amazing
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
An Excellent Philosophical/Practical Guide to Life Get a Life: A Guide to Finding a Philosophy to Live By (by Alan Poon) presents a smorgasbord of philosophies, both Eastern and Western, for the reader to choose from. And it’s hardly the stodgy philos An Excellent Philosophical/Practical Guide to Life Get a Life: A Guide to Finding a Philosophy to Live By (by Alan Poon) presents a smorgasbord of philosophies, both Eastern and Western, for the reader to choose from. And it’s hardly the stodgy philosophical treatise that one might imagine. The point is not to judge the metaphysics of these philosophical systems (or their beliefs about the fundamental nature of reality) but rather their practical stratagems and techniques for dealing with the ups and downs of life. The book is well written and teeming with intelligence and wit. Openminded seekers will find it a delight to read. The less openminded or less self-reflective maybe not so much, though its competent presentations may well open some minds. Even Stoicism and Epicureanism, despite their modern-day bad raps, are shown to have remarkably beneficial ways of looking at things. Readers will likely find themselves wanting to incorporate something from each of these philosophies in their lives. ...more |
|
|
Aug 30, 2025 08:02AM
· like
· see review ·
preview book
See a Problem?
We’d love your help.
Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of
Get a Life! A Guide to Finding a Philosophy to Live By by Alan Poon.
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Not the book you’re looking for?
Preview — Get a Life! A Guide to Finding a Philosophy to Live By by Alan Poon |
|
|
Ray Gregory
rated a book it was ok
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
An American Christian Nationalist Dream Scenario The Fractured Union (by James W. Parker) is another screed about politics and religion posing as a near-future novel, which includes a hefty batch of historical backstory. Anyone who has read this autho An American Christian Nationalist Dream Scenario The Fractured Union (by James W. Parker) is another screed about politics and religion posing as a near-future novel, which includes a hefty batch of historical backstory. Anyone who has read this author’s previous book Break Up of America (published in 2021) will get a strong sense of déjà vu from reading this iteration, because all the same points regarding what is wrong with America, plus the longed-for dissolution of the United States of America, were spelled out there too. While its prolific author is capable of writing well and telling a good, if longwinded, yarn, his perspective is permeated by religious conviction and especially religious grievances, most notably the notion that the U.S. government has infringed on Christians’ right to practice their religion. We are told the fanciful (and oxymoronic) tale that while the Founding Fathers wanted to keep government out of religion, they did not want to keep religion out of government. For example, “The majority of the delegates [to the Constitutional Convention] were firm in their belief that the nation should be grounded in a moral law derived from biblical teachings” — yet the U. S. Constitution that the majority of these delegates voted into existence, this blueprint the author alleges to be for a government based on the Bible, does not contain even one mention of the Bible, God, Christ, the Ten Commandments, Christianity, etc. Again, the author writes, “But the foundational principles were set in stone, woven into the fabric of the nation: that the Lord is the ultimate judge, lawgiver, and King; that governance should reflect divine order; and that the rights of the people should be guarded through the careful separation of powers. The Founding Fathers, whether conscious of it or not, had created a system that echoed the divine wisdom found in the Bible, ensuring that justice, liberty, and faith would forever guide the nation.” The Bible-thumping portrait that is painted of James Madison, especially regarding his contribution to the Constitution’s First Amendment (which insured the free exercise of religion as well as other rights), is bizarre, since while Madison often used biblical references, he was a strong advocate for individual conscience, religious freedom, and keeping the government separate from religion. Even Benjamin Franklin, who at the time of the Constitutional Convention was an advocate of deism and who questioned traditional Christian doctrines, is alleged by the author to have yearned for a government based on “the scriptures themselves.” But in truth Franklin, as were most of the rest of the Founding Fathers, were secularist sons of the Enlightenment who sought to save America from religious tyranny (including religious wars and religious persecution) as much as from political tyranny. The deistic God they paid lip service to was more of a philosophical construct than anything approaching a facsimile of the Christian deity. And indeed they chose symbols from Free Masonry and classical antiquity instead of from the Bible to decorate the national currency, government seals, government buildings, etc. A small point, howbeit a picturesque example of the book’s questionable historicity, is its assertion that “the grand marble pillars of the Supreme Court building were a fitting backdrop” when the Supreme Court of John Marshall decided (in the early 1800s) that the First Amendment prohibits the establishment of a national religion. Yet the Supreme Court building was not built until 1935. Before then the Court met in borrowed buildings in New York City and Philadelphia and later in the Capitol building in DC. It is claimed that successive Supreme Court decisions got the meaning of Jefferson’s “wall of separation” between church and state wrong. This is a common grievance of modern-day rightwing Christian nationalists who would like to impose the trappings of their religion on all manner of American life, private and public — and to hell with (pun intended) believers of other religions and non-believers in any religion. As if being able to publicly pray in any of the 350,000-400,000 churches that dot the American landscape isn’t enough for them, these authoritarian Christians particularly want to subject every American school kid, whatever his or her religious affiliation or lack thereof, to public prayers — even though Jesus himself told his followers that they should pray in private and not make a show of public prayer as the hypocritical Pharisees did. In the blink of an eye, the narrative jets past the wall-of-separation chip on Christian nationalists’ shoulders to their other gargantuan bugaboo, the “liberals,” the very banes of their existence. Did you know, for example, that Adolph Hitler was “a product of the liberal ideology”? That by the 1950s, Britain, France, and the United States “had become the strongholds of liberalism” and “had convinced the masses that their oppressive measures — censorship, surveillance, militarization — were for the greater good”? And here most of us were thinking it was the world’s dictatorships, rightwing and leftwing — and not its democracies — who were the really bad guys. A rant against the U.S. government's regulations and its imagined takeover of everything comes next as the story takes us into the lives of near-future everyday American rebels chaffing against the system run by those dastardly liberals, who are as clueless about making government work as they are about religion, and who are “demonizing anyone who disagrees with them” — and wow, how much like a revealing and hypocritical Freudian slip the word “demonizing” sounds here, with all its religious overtones. And even more so when one considers the present-day non-fictional reality of overtly Christian nationalist MAGA/Trumpism ruling the nation and cramming Project 2025 down all those liberals’ throats. But every perennial rightwing trope is trotted out, from states’ rights to secession to deporting all “illegals” to even returning the nation to the gold standard. One of the righteous rightwing rebels even accuses the story’s fictional liberal president of the United States of “threatening to pull state funding, override our laws, and use federal agencies as a political weapon.” WOW again, in this time of Trump. And what are the answers to the imagined liberal nightmare? For starters, a somewhat cuddlier, more inclusive “Confederacy 2.0” — what one of the book’s characters actually calls it —though now known as the Conservative States of America, which will usher in a new Golden Age based on “Gold. Coal. Oil. Industry. And God.” And a few more new nations are carved out of the old U. S. of A. too: the New Republic of Texas, the Mormon Nation, the Republic of Alaska (gotta wonder how long Vladimir Putin would let that go ungrabbed), the Hawaiian Nation (which would make an excellent fueling station for the Chinese navy), Southern California (now a territory of Mexico again), and what is left of the U.S. now renaming itself (what else?) the United Socialist States of America, which. of course, is doomed to failure because it’s still being run by all those feckless liberal devils. The bottom line is, if this kind of rightwing Christian nationalist fever dream, the end of the United States of America, is what floats your boat, and you don’t mind wading through the ton of numbing political machinations that make it possible, then this book may give you a few hours of rousing, howbeit delusional, validation. ...more |
|
|
Ray Gregory
rated a book really liked it
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
A Primer on Success 20 Universal Laws of Success: Your Path to Achievement (by Ali Pournamdarin) is a generalized and eclectic self-help guide, with its chapter titles accompanied by quotes from the likes of Napoleon Hill, Deepak Chopra, and Tony Robb A Primer on Success 20 Universal Laws of Success: Your Path to Achievement (by Ali Pournamdarin) is a generalized and eclectic self-help guide, with its chapter titles accompanied by quotes from the likes of Napoleon Hill, Deepak Chopra, and Tony Robbins, as well as the Buddha, Darwin, and Aristotle — plus eye-catching New Agey images that accompany each chapter. The text touches on all the things one is said to need to succeed in life: motivation, visualization, goal setting, mindfulness, values, preparation, prioritization, self-confidence, persistence, etc., etc. — and most of them seem quite commonsensical, with the chapter titles (each a “law of success”) themselves giving the gist of them, and the texts of the chapters usually doing little more than spelling out the obviousness of those titles. For example, Chapter 12 is titled, “The Law of Contingency and Backup Plan,” then it is explained that things can always go wrong, so it’s important to have contingency and backup plans. Or Chapter 13, “The Law of Continuous Improvement,” then different takes on how and why it’s good to keep improving. Or Chapter 20, “The Law of Persistence,” then the example of Harland Sanders, the late-in-life founder of the Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant chain, who finally succeeded bigtime in business after he tried lots of different things and refused to give up. While the book is well written and expressive, it’s more of an overview than the kind of hands-on guide that’s usually associated in the self-help genre, though it does reference sources where such practical help can be found. For example, the chapter on visualization spells out the importance of visualization, but it recommends another book for finding out how to do it. ...more |
|
|
Aug 22, 2025 03:20PM
· like
· see review ·
preview book
See a Problem?
We’d love your help.
Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of
20 Universal Laws of Success by Ali Pournamdarian.
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Not the book you’re looking for?
Preview — 20 Universal Laws of Success by Ali Pournamdarian |
|
|
Ray Gregory
rated a book it was ok
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
An American Christian Nationalist Dream Scenario The Fractured Union (by James W. Parker) is another screed about politics and religion posing as a near-future novel, which includes a hefty batch of historical backstory. Anyone who has read this autho An American Christian Nationalist Dream Scenario The Fractured Union (by James W. Parker) is another screed about politics and religion posing as a near-future novel, which includes a hefty batch of historical backstory. Anyone who has read this author’s previous book Break Up of America (published in 2021) will get a strong sense of déjà vu from reading this iteration, because all the same points regarding what is wrong with America, plus the longed-for dissolution of the United States of America, were spelled out there too. While its prolific author is capable of writing well and telling a good, if longwinded, yarn, his perspective is permeated by religious conviction and especially religious grievances, most notably the notion that the U.S. government has infringed on Christians’ right to practice their religion. We are told the fanciful (and oxymoronic) tale that while the Founding Fathers wanted to keep government out of religion, they did not want to keep religion out of government. For example, “The majority of the delegates [to the Constitutional Convention] were firm in their belief that the nation should be grounded in a moral law derived from biblical teachings” — yet the U. S. Constitution that the majority of these delegates voted into existence, this blueprint the author alleges to be for a government based on the Bible, does not contain even one mention of the Bible, God, Christ, the Ten Commandments, Christianity, etc. Again, the author writes, “But the foundational principles were set in stone, woven into the fabric of the nation: that the Lord is the ultimate judge, lawgiver, and King; that governance should reflect divine order; and that the rights of the people should be guarded through the careful separation of powers. The Founding Fathers, whether conscious of it or not, had created a system that echoed the divine wisdom found in the Bible, ensuring that justice, liberty, and faith would forever guide the nation.” The Bible-thumping portrait that is painted of James Madison, especially regarding his contribution to the Constitution’s First Amendment (which insured the free exercise of religion as well as other rights), is bizarre, since while Madison often used biblical references, he was a strong advocate for individual conscience, religious freedom, and keeping the government separate from religion. Even Benjamin Franklin, who at the time of the Constitutional Convention was an advocate of deism and who questioned traditional Christian doctrines, is alleged by the author to have yearned for a government based on “the scriptures themselves.” But in truth Franklin, as were most of the rest of the Founding Fathers, were secularist sons of the Enlightenment who sought to save America from religious tyranny (including religious wars and religious persecution) as much as from political tyranny. The deistic God they paid lip service to was more of a philosophical construct than anything approaching a facsimile of the Christian deity. And indeed they chose symbols from Free Masonry and classical antiquity instead of from the Bible to decorate the national currency, government seals, government buildings, etc. A small point, howbeit a picturesque example of the book’s questionable historicity, is its assertion that “the grand marble pillars of the Supreme Court building were a fitting backdrop” when the Supreme Court of John Marshall decided (in the early 1800s) that the First Amendment prohibits the establishment of a national religion. Yet the Supreme Court building was not built until 1935. Before then the Court met in borrowed buildings in New York City and Philadelphia and later in the Capitol building in DC. It is claimed that successive Supreme Court decisions got the meaning of Jefferson’s “wall of separation” between church and state wrong. This is a common grievance of modern-day rightwing Christian nationalists who would like to impose the trappings of their religion on all manner of American life, private and public — and to hell with (pun intended) believers of other religions and non-believers in any religion. As if being able to publicly pray in any of the 350,000-400,000 churches that dot the American landscape isn’t enough for them, these authoritarian Christians particularly want to subject every American school kid, whatever his or her religious affiliation or lack thereof, to public prayers — even though Jesus himself told his followers that they should pray in private and not make a show of public prayer as the hypocritical Pharisees did. In the blink of an eye, the narrative jets past the wall-of-separation chip on Christian nationalists’ shoulders to their other gargantuan bugaboo, the “liberals,” the very banes of their existence. Did you know, for example, that Adolph Hitler was “a product of the liberal ideology”? That by the 1950s, Britain, France, and the United States “had become the strongholds of liberalism” and “had convinced the masses that their oppressive measures — censorship, surveillance, militarization — were for the greater good”? And here most of us were thinking it was the world’s dictatorships, rightwing and leftwing — and not its democracies — who were the really bad guys. A rant against the U.S. government's regulations and its imagined takeover of everything comes next as the story takes us into the lives of near-future everyday American rebels chaffing against the system run by those dastardly liberals, who are as clueless about making government work as they are about religion, and who are “demonizing anyone who disagrees with them” — and wow, how much like a revealing and hypocritical Freudian slip the word “demonizing” sounds here, with all its religious overtones. And even more so when one considers the present-day non-fictional reality of overtly Christian nationalist MAGA/Trumpism ruling the nation and cramming Project 2025 down all those liberals’ throats. But every perennial rightwing trope is trotted out, from states’ rights to secession to deporting all “illegals” to even returning the nation to the gold standard. One of the righteous rightwing rebels even accuses the story’s fictional liberal president of the United States of “threatening to pull state funding, override our laws, and use federal agencies as a political weapon.” WOW again, in this time of Trump. And what are the answers to the imagined liberal nightmare? For starters, a somewhat cuddlier, more inclusive “Confederacy 2.0” — what one of the book’s characters actually calls it —though now known as the Conservative States of America, which will usher in a new Golden Age based on “Gold. Coal. Oil. Industry. And God.” And a few more new nations are carved out of the old U. S. of A. too: the New Republic of Texas, the Mormon Nation, the Republic of Alaska (gotta wonder how long Vladimir Putin would let that go ungrabbed), the Hawaiian Nation (which would make an excellent fueling station for the Chinese navy), Southern California (now a territory of Mexico again), and what is left of the U.S. now renaming itself (what else?) the United Socialist States of America, which. of course, is doomed to failure because it’s still being run by all those feckless liberal devils. The bottom line is, if this kind of rightwing Christian nationalist fever dream, the end of the United States of America, is what floats your boat, and you don’t mind wading through the ton of numbing political machinations that make it possible, then this book may give you a few hours of rousing, howbeit delusional, validation. ...more |
|
|
"Odyssey Through the Human Condition
Having been utterly fascinated by Ray Gregory's 'Old Souls', I eagerly dived into 'When Pigs Fly', and once again, this author proves himself to be a master of unconventional and deeply thought-provoking insights. Th" Read more of this review » |
|
|
Aug 16, 2025 09:22AM
· see review ·
preview book
See a Problem?
We’d love your help.
Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of
When Pigs Fly by Ray Gregory.
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Not the book you’re looking for?
Preview — When Pigs Fly by Ray Gregory |
|
|
Ray Gregory
rated a book liked it
|
Error rating book. Refresh and try again.
Rate this book
Clear rating
|
|
Rambling, Indulgent, and Gratuitous Tales of Demonic Possession Dr. Wolfstone’s Clinic: Patients 1-6 (by Joshua Scribner) reads nominally like the case studies of a busy hypnotherapist. But Dr. Wolfstone is more reminiscent Professor Van Helsing of D Rambling, Indulgent, and Gratuitous Tales of Demonic Possession Dr. Wolfstone’s Clinic: Patients 1-6 (by Joshua Scribner) reads nominally like the case studies of a busy hypnotherapist. But Dr. Wolfstone is more reminiscent Professor Van Helsing of Dracula fame, because all his cases turn out to be literally diabolical horror tales, and his hypnotic techniques border on the darkly supernatural. Now for the TRIGGER WARNINGS: There’s lots of graphic (as in mostly anatomical) sex and lots of graphic (as in gory) and sadistic violence, but to call this a headlong dive into psychosexual perversity would be an understatement. Dr. Wolfstone’s patients are possessed by some particularly nasty demons, and the accomplished hypnotherapist has learned how to exorcize or incapacitate these demons with his hypnotic techniques. The identities of the patients change, but each new patient feels like just more of the same as the reader wades through all the sordid — and gratuitous? — details of what these demons have urged their human hosts to do, with one horrific crime after another, every dark recess of the psyche visited, from assorted forms of murder to vampiric bloodsucking and vivisection and cannibalism — and, of course, all that lurid sex to spice things up. Readers may well wonder if the point is anything more than the sheer indulgent excess of it all. How many times, for example, can a character eat people’s hearts, which he rips out of their living bodies (usually after having sex with them) before readers groan, “Enough”? Expect to witness that savage excess nine times in this book. Yet the writing has a natural conversational ring that lends lifelike authenticity, though this includes lifelike rambling, repetition, and tedium as well. It’s as if the reader is eavesdropping on actual (howbeit preternatural) hypnotherapy sessions, including the hypnotherapist’s clinical if often cryptic or pseudo-parapsychological observations, but the depravity of the actions that the demons have got their human wards to take is as exhausting as it is repugnant. In short, if you’re into graphic, gruesome horror shows and get a scary jolt out of imagining yourself the victim of one of these demonic monsters, and you find all the sex more a turn-on than mere gratuitous titillation, this book might be up your alley. But if those kinds of thrills aren’t your thing, maybe keep browsing for your next read. What’s ultimately scary, and possibly the metaphorical point of the whole exercise, is that some actual human beings out there might identify with these monsters. ...more |
|
|
Aug 15, 2025 11:47AM
· like
· see review ·
preview book
See a Problem?
We’d love your help.
Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of
Doctor Wolfstone’s Clinic by Joshua Scribner.
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Not the book you’re looking for?
Preview — Doctor Wolfstone’s Clinic by Joshua Scribner |
|
Goodreads Librarians Group
— 303880 members
— last activity 0 minutes ago
Goodreads Librarians are volunteers who help ensure the accuracy of information about books and authors in the Goodreads' catalog. The Goodreads Libra Goodreads Librarians are volunteers who help ensure the accuracy of information about books and authors in the Goodreads' catalog. The Goodreads Librarians Group is the official group for requesting additions or updates to the catalog, including: * Adding new books or editions * Editing book information (including covers) * Combining and merging book editions * Edits to page counts, quotes or awards * Correcting author profiles for authors not in the Goodreads Author Program If you're a Goodreads member with a new request, click Join Group. Once you're added to the group, you can post your question following this link. Simple requests (e.g. page count updates) typically take around 48 hours depending on the volume of requests, while more complex requests could take up to a couple of weeks (e.g. adding a new book). Authors, if you are a member of the Goodreads Author Program, you can edit information about your own books. Find out how in this guide. Keep in mind that Librarians don't: * Grant or give insights into Librarian applications / Librarian status * Move ISBNs or ASINs between editions * Help with non-catalog Support questions (e.g. How do I reset my password?) For help with these queries or to submit general questions, comments or feature requests, try Goodreads Help or use the Contact Us form. If you're a Librarian and want to process requests, please refer to our Librarian Manual to ensure edits are performed in line with Goodreads policies. ...more









